>>3081883>>3081887Again, thanks for answering.
I didn't know that and yes, to me they looked decent. Sure even I can see that they are photo shopped, but not to that extent. If you're not to bothered, could you point out what gives away that something has been photobashed and maybe post some of your art? If it is HnK related I am interested to see it.
>>3081885No problem, she's best gem after all.