>>3179237That's not what I want to come across. His opinion, is, well his opinion - but his argument was based on a lie. Pointing out that lie revealed his dishonesty, and also invalidated his argument.
>>3179247>You can't counter the point [....] so you agree with me.I did not disprove or try to disprove that fact, but I did prove that you had no point with that fact. Simply because there is more development at one point in the series, does not disprove that there's development in another. You presented a non-argument, that's all. You insisting on your "point" despite having nothing to base it on, is emotional attachment.
Continuing on:
>Again, you resist making the obvious connection You repeat your earlier dishonesty. You claim the connection is "obvious", but as we've proved earlier in this thread, you're leaving out most of the scene and it's context, and only focus on a single still out of several stills. You're again the one who's emotionally attached here because you refuse logic and pretend that what you want to be true, is the truth. Your point was disproven already.
>Instrumentality isn't positive. Rei herself says she doesn't see her role in Instrumentality as positive. Next you're going to tell us Komm Susser Tod and Thanatos are upbeat pop songs.
>EoE doesn't offer either a conclusive or positive end. People still question the beach scene Irrelevant, and not an argument. False even. A strawman even. Who said these things were positive? You with your strawman did. Moreover, it is undeniable that there is a hopeful message in the End of Evangelion, as it is undeniable that Rei had a hand in this positive end happening. You can "imagine" it as a bad ending by fanwanking a scenario where everything goes to hell AFTER the ending, but that is just fanwank.
The dialogue in the film is positive towards the end, not negative - that everyone will come back and live again, and that everyone can be paradise if people can find the will to live.
