>>3519876>What role do you believe she could've had on the story?I'm going to be 100% honest with you. I have never played a Zelda game that doesn't feature Sheik, except for MM. I don't know TP's story. I just know that I want her to be a part of it, she was meant to, and I would definitely know that plot if that occurred.
>Basically anything that expands her character by adding different aspects to her personality is welcomed rightYes. Like you said, as long as it doesn't break character and it sounds plausible for her, I accept it. I need as much Sheik material as physically possible, and I would like to consider more things canon than not if possible.
>>3519879That was a very nice answer to my question. Thank you for going so in-depth. I already hate the discussion surrounding my Sheik in general by most fans, but most people don't outright ignore her personality (for the most part) and she is not typical fanservice material. So I think you have it worse. I'm sorry that you have it so hard.
>>3519883>At what point do you think that both Sheik's and Zelda's body to be the sameThat's a pretty complicated answer I need to give. But I don't want to bore you about minute differences in the appearances between my Sheik and Zelda, so I'll save the small details. I think of it this: since Sheik and Zelda share a body, if she shares a feature with Zelda, that means it just didn't change on Zelda's body. Anything that is the same is a feature of Zelda is a feature that my Sheik inherits. I contend that generally if a feature is shared, my Sheik WOULDN'T have it if she had her own body. There are exceptions, but that's the general rule. I love my Sheik and all forms of my Sheik. So I will love those shared features. However, it would be a blatant lie for me to say that I wouldn't like those features on Zelda. But I need to always be practicing restraint so as to not get sidetracked in my love for my Sheik.
(Cont.)
