>>2247012>>You mean stating things that occur in the movie followed by your side saying "It isn't Rei because she doesn't poka poka"?>Nobody ever said that, and you should realize how weak your arguments are since you have to fabricate comebacks with dumb strawmen.Just to take two examples here are anons who did not use "strawmen" as a trip:
>>2243473>Let's say I give you for the sake of argument a temporary right that Rei Q is somehow despite all evidence, Rei Ayanami, won't you at least acknowledge that Rei Q is still wholly derogatory to Rei's character?>>2245814>The fact that she didn't cry or anything made it obvious she has nothing to do with Rei at all.Tell us honestly, do you want to try and claim that isn't exactly what I was talking about or do you want to abandon all credibility and say it doesn't match exactly the words in my quote?
