>>2821021>no u>u are the problem not me aka the person who shat up at least 2 threads with no provocationBased off this speech pattern I'd say you're also the person who was hell bent on attacking me in #104. Everything falls into place now.
Simply put, the one at fault for the new Qshitter is the original Qshitter.
Thank you for finally allowing me to place the final puzzle pieces down. It all makes sense now. Messy, convoluted, and slightly odd at parts but this explains everything I've tried to question since you (or as you refer to as, "everyone else" with that hilariously poor grammar) started attacking me for no reason.
