>>2993620Here's the fundamental problem, you're not out to discuss, or anything else.
A normal person who is out to do something else than fling shit, would be perfectly capable of linking together the data in the links himself. But you want to be spoonfed.
Arguing with you is a little like arguing with a crazed butthurt Hillary-support that needs to see "source" that Trump won the elections. If I posted a picture of him at the white house, that would somehow not be proof.
Just a friendly reminder that all you've done is ask for more and more sources without ever addressing what you've been given. As far as I'm concerned, you've been thoroughly shown up,
