>>2167639Her/His name would still be Rei Ayanami.
>>2167651Because people appreciate Rei and all that she is, is why they can't accept any downgrades or a really poor shitty version of it with no merit of it's own.
There is no false idealized Rei, there's Rei, and you're quite blind if you don't think the issue is the opposite: a crappy and poor Rei is being forced instead. This has nothing to do with Rei at all, it's a new character.
I don't know why you get a boner over Rei Q existing.
>>2167654Not really good but mediocre stuff or promising stuff there's been.
>>2167656Rei Q isn't a subset of Rei Ayanami, she's a subset of another Ayanami, Yui. They're both Ayanami Series.
Rebuild lore is different. Stop trying to push this shitty neo-Rei that should be retconned away.