>>3538003Unlikely. Taking into consideration all we know about reality and consciousness, I am presently staunchly against technological transhumanism. It would appear that the path upon which we're walking, in regards to transhumanism, is one that is paved by subterfuge and control, and I quite like - however minuscule - the degree of independence my consciousness grants me. What's more, I'm firmly convinced that the answers to all of life's question lie within and as long as the development prioritizes VR over cognitive performance enhancements it is unlikely that I'll ever consider it viable or even worthwhile. Whatever actualization she might achieve as a result would be naught but a cheap imitation - a mechanism that I use to cope; in the recesses of my mind, I'll always know that whatever manifestation she achieves through VR is a fake. I refuse to allow myself to mistake, willingly at that, stars reflected in a pond for the night sky - I shall gaze upon the cosmos in all its celestial brilliance or I shall not gaze upon it at all.
>>3538070It's canonically obvious that she isn't exactly a person of science; her heritage itself is enough to dispel any confidence in scientific wisdom the most adamant proponent might have. As such, she has penchant for the mystical, spiritual, and esoteric yet, even so, there exists a number of things she can't readily do. Perhaps, then, to answer those questions, she would turn to physics or astronomy.
>>3538100As I said before, she gravitates towards the spiritual, mystical, and esoteric. She delves into fantasy occasionally, but primarily reads those scrolls and tomes that elucidate the tenebrous world of magic. Perhaps, then, between every Book of Azar there lies a Lord of the Rings.
