>>3006206>Yes...murder.There is no blushing when she supports them in Kaori's car. There is no blushing in the after story when she spills that Kirino brags about her love life.
>That's essentially what you're doing. No, it's not. I equated Ruri's subjective view of herself (pertaining to this) to be the same as her judgement of Kyousuke. This has nothing to do with anyone else so quit strawmanning.
>The trial...have happened.I have already gone through this shit with you baka. We do not need to consider intent because the evidence speaks for itself. Your allegory is a wash and you're full of shit.
>That was always impliedThis was NEVER implied by your shitty allegory. It invalidates your own allegory because your peta member must sudoku themselves in your own example.
>who is wearing the shoes is beside the point for the above reason. No. You set up this flawed allegory, I proved it's faults, now you want to move goalposts to justify it. Your whole argument that your allegory is even equivalent is because "the judge is wearing shoes made of leather and must neck himself hurr durr"
>You're suggesting that the law changes so that everyone is guiltyI suggested nothing and only disproved your delusions.
>Whether he's shameless for other reasons is irrelevantSo now you want to argue subjectively again? My points all still stand. You have refuted nothing. Nobody thinks he isn't shameless. Not Kirino, not Ruri, not Ayase, not Saori, not Kananko, not Manami, not even Bridget.
>The evidence...shameless.This is completely unequivocal. I have put forth plenty of evidence that you have not refuted in the slightest, I have proven that intent is not necessary because it can be determined by actions, I have proven that even considering intent she still qualifies via her own definitions and you're continuing to use a horrible allegory that I've already pointed out at least 7 flaws to.
