>>2848015You are. The 52% of crime accounts for all black crime. Likewise the 13% of population accounts for the full black population. 100% would imply that black people commit all the crime in the US, and that wouldn't be grounds for discrimination, that would be grounds for gassing.
That entire statement on population adjusted makes no sense and I'm not even white so I'm afraid I'm not commenting on it.
>what about white collar crimeDepends, how much does it account for all crime? How much collateral damage or damage at all does it cause, in comparison to say, murder, or rape, or armed robbery, all fields that blacks hold the majority in, by the way.
>it even has white in itSo you're just one of those "YOU'RE A FUCKING WHITE MALE" types then?
>le fuck capitalism amirite gaizYep, you are.
>statistics are irrelevantSo attempting to use statistics as a method of objectively gauging bigotry is irrelevant? Sounds to me like you're just conveniently ignoring reality.
And nowhere did I even imply that this was my political opinion. This was merely a theoretical scenario used to gauge your reaction and opinion, and you reacted violently enough to resort to the "YOUR A RACIST GO BACK TO /POL/" buzzword. In a sense it sort of proves my original point (that your basis for bigotry makes no sense and is easily manipulated) right.
Case closed.
