>>2848059The only thing you've proven is that you're an idiot. Your wall of text doesn't do anything to refute the central points:
You didn't know what a bigot was. You defended that bigotry was a good thing. You proved you were a bigot when you refused to go look up what a bigot actually was when prompted, but instead went on reciting political rants. You even missed the point entirely about the statistics being irrelevant to the definition of bigotry.
This is the central point, your hypotheticals are irrelevant. There is nothing vague or difficult to understand about the term "bigot". If you want to find out what it means, then read what I wrote earlier. Don't agree? Check out a dictionary. Don't agree?
Congratulations, you're officially retarded. Also don't even try to pretend you aren't a massive shitposter who went on a shitposting spree, screaming at the moderators for being paid and whatnot. Are you so pathetic that you need to be reminded of that? You can't be honest enough with yourself?
>>2848063That was sort of the point. Different social and economic band, different types of crime. It's a matter of opportunity. For the record, I don't care whichever way the spindle turns, the central points is about bigotry.
