I apologise for hijacking the thread with an argument.
>>2300552>but worthy of recognition, absolutely not.Posting it in a /c/ thread they will never see is hardly encouraging it.
I care not about the artist anyway.
>Then do it, and stop bitching when someone calls a stone a stone.I am, but then you proceed to become a massive faggot about it, and here we are.
Also calling a stone a stone != trying to stop stoneposting
>I'm sorry for having standardsThat doesn't actually make sense, it should be
>I'm sorry for having high standards>you're willingly keeping your face in the mud.Thats the thing though isn't it. You seem to think that I think they're amazing. I don't. I see them for what they are, mediocre. Just as I would see a high quality of work for what it is.
The only difference is that I'm not boycotting them.
I'll also happily avoid this discussion in the future, Lest the threads turn to us arguing consistently.
