>>3844565Why do you keep shifting goalposts? The people you reply to thoroughly debunked your points in the previous posts you made, and then you follow up by not acknowledging that, and just making up new points?
Points which are, just as false as the previous ones? I mean this is just basic shit dude. A clone is not the original by definition. There isn't any mystery here.
Claiming otherwise is at this point just trolling.