>>2203279And I thought it was simplistic, presented in a child like manner and was generally at a younger-than-highschool level. If they had said "Romel did this at the battle of this and this shows he was a general" then fine. But
"The real Erwin Rommel fought on the western front, and his tanks would often penetrate so far, so deep into enemy territory that the axis command would lose track of them, thus his division got the nickname "The Ghost Division".
neat, huh?"
"Erwin Rommel in real life was pretty cool, humble and stuff. The Africa front was also known as a "clean war". Rommel himself refused to have prisoners of war executed. There were rumors of him being in the conspiracy against hitler that ended in failure, with that bomb and stuff."
Is drivel, absolute drivel. The first isn't too terrible but the second is god awful - it hurts to read that shit.
>Just drop it, you're being ridiculously hostile for no good reason here. By making people feel negative about posting and expressing themselves, people feel less confident about contributing in the future and there is less content for everyone overall.You post good things you get good things in return you post bullshit you get bullshit back. Thats how it works, it isn't a "feel good everyones equal man" bullshit funhouse.
>For the fact-posting Erwin fan in question, I say continue at your leisure: to me and I daresay most others, it rather improves the quality of the thread. I personally am trying to keep this thread bumped for a friend on holiday, and I am sure she would appreciate it if she had lots of interesting facts and new content to come back to!Yeah it WOULD improve the thread quality if he ACTUALLY POSTED FUCKING FACTS instead he posts drivel, child like drivel.
