>>2223279Why the Churchill III specifically? Why not the IV which is armed with the same 57mm but also can be equipped with the 230mm Petard Mortar, 75mm NA variants, 95mm Howitzer (In the Mk. V, same turret as IV) or VI with the 75mm in a slightly modified IV turret.
Or the Churchill VII which is more heavily armored then any previous version can be armed with a flamethrower and is the primary British flamethrower vehicle of the war? Which can also carry the 95mm in the Mk. VIII version and carries 75mm in the standard variant. It is also more heavilly armored than the Tiger 1.
