>>2416703You're so disgustingly stupid. You're not even smart enough to sage the image capped thread on /c/ so it doesn't get bumped.
How about you actually try reading instead of just shitposting. You know what the most pathetic part of this is? If you could, right now, you'd be spamming crack shit as hard as you could.
If you read it you might actually learn something. Instead of just assuming you know what's written there based on a couple words.
The fact they're fiction doesn't change the fact you are treating them like shit. You didn't counter anything I said in my post. "thur fiction" doesn't prove how you're not making negative implications about them. Yes, characters have feelings. That's how it works. If they didn't have feelings they wouldn't actually be characters, they'd just be blank slates not doing anything. Feelings are not something specifically for living people. Feelings are just expressions. When two characters kiss it (usually) love, the express is the kiss, the feeling is love. You're and literally autistic for not understanding something that simple. Yes, one of the real symptoms of autism is not understand emotions.
And the sooner you learn not to base every single thought you have on assumptions the soon you'll actually be useful to society. I'm not serious, I'm just smarter than you, and you take that as me being serious. Because I'm smart enough to explain in full how you're wrong you take it as being serious. Guess what? Explaining a point in full is the normal state of reasoning for people. That's how communication works. By giving data through messages.
Here's a little thought exercise for you. Go outside right now, find the closest person and ask them what they do during the day, then when they ask you what you do say "Oh, I just sit around insulting little girls, calling their feelings cheap and worthless, saying their love is meaningless, and all around treating them like tools." and see what the persons reaction is.
