>>2589250I hate to get like this on /c/, so I apologize ahead of time. But if you love something, I feel, you must strive be it's strongest critic.
No, quality is not always subjective, it's just a buzz word used people people call out bad attempts at "art". The Mona Lisa objectively better than a dog turd smeared on a dinner plate. Because even if you don't necessarily like it, you can tell when something is more refined and complete. People have just convinced themselves to accept mediocrity, that is why "modern art" is so bad.
Regardless of quality though, there needs to be less posted a day, it's one anon doing it as far as I can tell. I'm not trying to discourage someone share images, but I have no want to contribute to a thread that caps in a week because someone dumps 20-25 images a day. If less were posted daily, maybe the quality issue wouldn't be such a deal, and wouldn't drown out quality images.
>TL;DR: If lots of people post 1 image a day, it's better than 1 person posting 25 images a day. It makes a healthier posting eco-system and adds more variety to a thread. 
