>>3331212well it really depends - for personal reasons i do not enjoy explicit art at all and avoid it at all costs but as i said there can be art labeled as questionable that can be done extremely well. non-sexual nudity can be cute/beautiful so long as the artist or requestor of the image isn't (not to be a jerk or anything) perverted - they actually take the time and effort to make sure the image they draw is art and not porn. even if it is well drawn i still can't enjoy it for it's quality since i love the girls in the art over the art itself. drawing girls in these overly sexual situations that seem out of character isn't cute, it's done for the sole enjoyment of the perverted artist or requestor - it's taking the girl and sexualizing or degrading her for personal enjoyment. I get that this is a hot opinion for some but it's my personal opinion on the topic of explicit art.
over-sexualization is not cute or enjoyable in my eyes but nudity when done well can be super cute - quality doesn't matter to me since it's the thought behind creating the art that matters since we should always do it for her (at least on /c/, why else would we be here!). sorry for the wall of text, wasn't trying to be rude or anything lol
also not sure if you are doing this already but try to sage when text posting just due to the nature of how /c/ works, just a friendly heads up!
