>>3737534I'll try to keep this fully SFW, but I think this needs to be said.
Just because you find a girl beautiful, doesn't mean you want to do dirty stuff with her.
Just because you find a girl's face cute, doesn't mean you want to cover it in "nasty stuff".
Just because you find a girl's hands extremely soft to the touch, doesn't mean you want her to use them to do *that*.
Just because you appreciate a girl's figure and maybe even compliment it, doesn't mean you are treating her as a sexual object, or wish to do so.
Here on /c/, we all wholesomely celebrate cuteness along with prettiness, no? Physical shape and traits (can) play a huge role in contributing to a girl's cuteness and prettiness. But it would seem to me that the very existence and behavior of this board proves that appreciating that can be done in a very, again, wholesome way.
Busty =/= ecchi, or lewd, or dirty. Big chests are almost universally considered attractive (I'm saying this as a justice supporter). So long as you are respectful and don't act like a pervert (which you clearly aren't, anon), I see no guilt in appreciating a full chest.
"She's so beautiful", "she has such a pretty face", "her hands are so soft and gentle". I don't see celebrating any of these traits as offensive, personally. So why not her bust, too?
She has a lovely chest. She fills her shirts really nicely. Her hugs must feel particularly motherly. Her proportions are very flattering.
I think those would be some nice compliments. There's a difference between this and intentionally staring, or compulsively trying to determine her cup size, or just spending *24/7* fantasizing about her using her breasts to do "that stuff" to your "thing".
As
>>3737539correctly pointed out, her chest sure is not all she is. But if you call her "sweetest angel", her personality must mean a lot to you.
Don't feel bad if a, let's say _voluminous_ part of her beauty bewitches your eyes from time to time.
They're nice.
