>>4039250>I wouldn't know since I've never worn armor or a dress for that matter (I'm a man I don't think I could pull off wearing an ornate expensive elaborate poofy extremely feminine dress, though I'm not above wanting to try one on at least once)you arent alone on that one
i was just thinking: underwear, propably some sort of corset, many layers of pettycoats, maybe even a metalframe for the dress itself, then the dress
all of this has to weigh something and its propably quiet noticable. now if you made the dress from silk and several layers it will surely add up to a few kilos which will lead to > exhausting to wear > wearer needs to pace herself or take breaks > more classical feminine behavior > fits the over poofstyle
that said, taming tomboys with dresses has its special appeal
>>4039411>I am in great belief of poofy armour>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>bikini armour as the sign of femininity.i personally dont get the "skimpy" crowd preferess less over more but to each his own i guess. leaves us with the poofy girls while the rest chases the slutty ones, but its not like there cant be something interesting under those dresses. and while having mentioned it, corsets, stockings and gloves are way more interesting than just bras and panties anyway
as to the actual armour, i think there are some good designs out there or just plain "feminized" medival pieces of armour
