>>4198481>>4198381>Can't even slap together a fraudulent paper Sounds fun I'll do it for him
10.15585/mmwr.mm7038e1
Johnson and Johnson performers worse than competitors
https://journals.lww.com/jcardiovascularmedicine/Fulltext/2022/02000/Concerning_the_unexpected_prothrombotic_state.1.aspxpaper discusses the issues pertaining to AstraZenica and J&J as recombinant vector DNA vaccines and has a similar conclusion to the paper below
10.15585/mmwr.mm7032e4
review of after reports stating in rare cases GBS (Guillain-Barré syndrome) and TTS (thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome) has been reported in recipients of the vaccination, the median symptom onset was 13 days after vaccination (0-75 range)
they calculate 20.2 cases of GBS in 1 million does (nice) while the TTS shows 3 per million (very nice)
Their conclusion is there IS risk to vaccinating with J&J that people should be aware of but the benefits outweigh the risks
https://www.fda.gov/media/146304/downloadfollowing fact sheet stating "The Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine can cause thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) which may be life-threatening." its quoted by FDA in recommending a pause in its distribution
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-and-cdc-lift-recommended-pause-johnson-johnson-janssen-covid-19-vaccine-use-following-thoroughShows their is and was FDA hesitancy surrounding J&J
My take is there's a middle ground you can meet on J&J does have health complications and IS worse than other vaccines but they are very very rare and not serious consideration (maybe so rare its funny to joke about?)
Idk I've probably just added more fuel to the fire lol, if that's the case i hope it results in a big EXPLOSION
