>>4337The point is I can pull random groups and assign benign fractions to them to say how they represent 4chan's userbase but that doesn't mean its accurate.
Besides, furfags on 4chan are different from the traditional breed. we get the folks that just like the porn and couldn't give less of a fuck about the culture (although I've met some of those fursona freaks on here too), and then theres the furfag shitposters that use furry to get people riled up. I have a hard time believing anywhere near half of 4chan is furry, in ANY shape or form.
If you wish to argue this matter further, the kiddies on /b/ are more than welcome to address your grievances.
