>>2819846>There's a decent shot you might be an idiot.Right back at you. It's like you didn't bother to read anything.
>the artists it was trained on can't keep up with.That's already illegal, I've said this many times, if an artist can be identified, if it's obviously copying a distinct style, etc. Sounds like you barely know anything about the subject or AI in general and just taking on some generic twitter anti-AI point of view without even thinking, and when another point of view gets brought up you just throw out insults as a defense mechanism.
