>>2165461That's just not fair. There's no part of the /e/ rules that say closeups of specific parts of the body is not allowed on /e/. You could have responded with substance instead of just excluding my criticism from what /e/ allows. As it is you clearly disagree with my criticism, but instead of proving your images to not be disappointing when I only opened them for pubic hair, you just deflected.
I'm not even asking for closeups of pubic hair. In fact I specifically said that doesn't make a stimulating thread. I said I just expected more than "anime girl who coincidentally has pubic hair". Again, you can't even distinguish a single pixel of pubic hair in most of these thumbnails, and you dismissed me saying none of these make me think "oh my god her pubic hair"; instead I have to enlarge the image to even check if they have any. I said it's tiring. I feel you also think it's fair to say virtually none of these pics put pubic hair on a pedestal, but you're angry I said that out loud, so you angrily sent me to /d/...
