>>1062984>the only reason to not use carbon is priceneck yourself fredward
>>1063058peak fred
>>1063074>racing under the power of a motoryou ride a carbon e-bike too you fat piece of shit?
>>1063249>spending even more 1000s on a bike that is structurally compromised by the light from the sun lol
>>1063380>resistant frameswhat did he mean by this?
>comfort is not an argument>running 32s on your brittle aluminum trash just so your teeth don't rattle outlol
>>1063391>I've literally never ridden a steel bicycleout, child
>>1063447>I can't tell the difference between frame materials so you can't eitherout, child
>>1063295>If you hit hard enough to break it, it's also enough to bend a steel/aluminum frame.this is factually untrue. carbon is stiff against the forces exerted by a rider but the slightest impact on another axis is enough to shatter it.
>hurr i can't clamp my garbon frame into a workstand but it's just as durable as steel u guys!>>1063530>>>/o/ you manchild>>1063606>throwing bikes off a cliffyou ever wonder why they don't make rigid carbon mtbs? hint: because the material is weak as fuck
