>>1919874>Why is it always mass transit that's on the chopping block when budget constraints appear?Because mass transit tends to serve less people than it costs. This is the same crying that says less than $3B for widening Katy Freeway is a "waste of money" yet thinks nothing of a $133B+ high speed rail line that's eating up money in California.
>We will officially no longer be maintaining them.States HAVE done budget cuts on roads, with crumbling paved rural roads often getting converted back to gravel or dirt.
>We all know damn well the trillion rural and suburb streets around our country don't generate enough economic activity to justify themselvesMarohn's work is vague, flawed, and can be refuted, but such arguments are dismissed as "carbrained" or "cagetroll" or mumbling about the petroleum industry.
