>>1549055>individualist era of the market economy is long overIt's a cat and mouse game. Circa 2009 the mice were in the lead with cryptocurrencies and shit like that but now the Cat has adapted and the mice need to evolve again. Only useful idiots like you want to give up.. *why dont you just move to China then?*
>there were wealthy capitalist countries who'd done itYour idea of "capitalist" is another flavor of collectivism. I think we are free market advocates and you're conflating the two.
>>1549059>But negative externalities by definition are involuntarily imposed.Nice meme word right from (((modern economic theory))) (excuses for violently controlling markets)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Externality#:~:text=A%20negative%20externality%20is%20any,an%20indirect%20cost%20to%20individuals.
>credited with first articulating, and Arthur C. Pigou (1877–1959) is credited with formalizing the concept of externalitieshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Cecil_Pigou>His work covered various fields of economics, particularly welfare economics, but also included Business cycle theory, unemployment, public finance, index numbers, and measurement of national output.>welfare economics>welfare economicsThis dude's job is to get you to accept the trojan horse of the welfare state, economic controls, and general Keynesianism. Much like (((modern monetary theory))) and related bullshit. He is like an old time Paul Krugman.
It's more useful to talk about negative rights (right not to be subjected to an action of another person or group) but anyways;
your only relationship with a corp should be either deciding to work for them or buy something from them
Your blatant STRAWMAN of "le ebin corporation polluting the river" has to do with who owns what clay and you might have to form a "property owners association" or some shit and stop people from fucking up eachother's property. That is like the most basic issue, as simple as "ree who will build the roads lol."
