>>1549115>because youre a socialistI'm not. One extreme failing doesn't make the other extreme right.
> i dont want them to have the power of GOVERNMENT lolWhat are these magical powers you believe government has that would be unable to a sufficiently powerful corporate entity?
>Umm what about MAD sweety?Doesn't exist when asymmetries of power exist. Look at the Taliban taking over Afghanistan, when everyone there had weapons. Or the cartels in Mexico. Or Daesh. Or the East India Company.
>WOW YOURE EVEN WORSE THAN I THOUGHTThus saith the schizo namefag.
>Why should you be able to demand someone take care of you and YOUR CHILDREN at the threat of violenceThe same benefit is provided to everyone and it functions as a positive externality. A more educated society is a better, more productive one.
>with modern technology they would prevent you from reproducingThe super-free society practicing bodily intervention on its members. Though a high level of constant surveillance combined with an enforcement body (subject to abuse) would be needed to prevent defection from the provision of public goods.
>NOT BE A BURDENA burden as defined by who? Even someone working a low paying job is offering some value. Additionally, the market is ever in flux and today's solid career holder might be tomorrow's unemployed. Imagine a community centred around Bethlehem Steel, for example.
>Robots you fuckare nowhere near replacing humans in anything other than highly specialized roles. And even setting those the system for automation would require a great deal of specialized labour that might not be in the community. And you'd thereafter be highly dependent on whoever you were sourcing the automation from.
>workers dont have that much leverage do they?I was saying that even if you reduced cost of production, there's still the full, costly chain from raw material to end user creating a floor on prices.
