>>1459403No idea how you're ID-ing parts from the pic+link in
>>1459015, so I can only assume you're the boomer in question.
Crankset, stem, bars, levers, and seatpost, and probably saddle look original (and therefore 20 years old), and everything else is too small to make out. Plus there's a big questionable area on the fork that needs to be examined for damage. With no other info to go off of it'd be retarded to pay $200+ on something that retailed for under $1k 20 years ago.
