>>1875969i measured it again and it's just about 10mm of slack (20mm total from top to bottom) so it's not crazy tight like 7.5mm. someone might think that it's half an inch if they were to do it by eye.
>>1875971i didn't buy the chainring specifically for the narrow-wide aspect but imo there is no downside. it's just a comfy fit with equal lateral play against the inner/outer plates of the chain. i can't hear any noise at all from the chainring over the sound coming from the phil wood cog. it's just 8.5 grams heavier than the stock sram s300 chainring but much stiffer and better looking imo. the chainring barely matters for aero btw, it's maybe 1-2 watts from a fully aero crankset.
