>>1820236>conducts "empirical" analysis with poor experimental design>draws a conclusion they were biased towards (scientists are all cyclefags btw)>faggots everywhere who also wanted this conclusion cling to faulty study because IFLS and DONT QUESTION THE SCIENCEYes they are dogmatic retards and you wouldn't know how to interpret a study if it hit you in the face. You probably couldn't even pass high school math.