>>1477078>When you narrow down all your negative data until you find one to exalt, that's praxis babyNone of those incidents involved a Soyuz rocket, so they aren't data about it. Apollo 1 similarly is not data about the STS. STS-51-L and STS-107 are data about the STS safety record. Soyuz did more launches over a longer period of time with no fatalities. Also the irony of that coming from someone whose favourite excuse is "space is expensive/risky"
When the only way to hold your opinion is to have a schoolchild's knowledge about the biiiig rocket, now that's autism.
>STS was good Have you seen the concepts they were working on before getting continuously slapped down by OMB? Their original concept would've been fully reusable, and incorporated a titanium hot structure.
To get back to prototype/concepts, McDonnell-Douglas Two-stage fully reusable STS concept.
