>>1565817Jesus christ, I would say this is a strawman but the possibility of you being too retarded to actually understand what I said is all too real.
What is gyroscopic force, you absolute fucking retard.
I have owned a 29" trail bike and a 27.5" dh bike. I can tell you the cornering properties of wheel sizes are about the ACTUAL FUCKING WHEELS.
Isn't that a fucking shock.
What about bikes like the old specialized enduro with 27.5" and 29" options? Do you think those corner the same, do you really have that little understanding of physics?
29" wheels, geometry being the same between bikes, want to stay upright in corners more than 27.5" wheels.
Don'y write me off as an armchair warrior because you're too fucking stupid to use a shred of common sense.
My 27.5 yt tues, while being more stable from length and slacker HTA, is more willing to lean into corners.
My enduro, less stable from geo, wants to stay upright and requires more force to "lean" into corners.
Out of corners your feel they require much more input to change dirrection/momentum. This means they are less "jibby" and harder to whip/throw around in the air (albiet more stable and less likely to buck you off a lip).
This has NOTHING to do with geo.
How are you this fucking stupid? How?
>>1565836I agree, that what is promoted is usually not what people are best off buying.
Most dumb people buy what racers are riding, even though they would be much better suited to different products.
26" died because most people didn't care enough to keep it alive. 27.5" and 26" feel very similar, so people didn't feel the need to fight the change in market.
27.5, despite being claimed as "dead" by media, is still alive. There is a noteabke difference between 27.5" and 29" wheels amd people like myself like 27.5" wheels enough to keep buying bikes with those wheels dispite what we're told.
I like both a lot.
On dh/superenduro long travel bikes I like 29" wheels, they smooth out the trail with their roll...
