>>1607750>fuck no,fuck yes
>professional avionics guy here who can read between the linesand we appreciate the hard and skilled work you guys do, but as a pilot there are other lines of the report which are much more interesting to read between
consider your failure scenario
now consider the next couple seconds after this timestamp
>https://youtu.be/5ESJH1NLMLs?t=824the lines you're reading between take up a couple of pages
the FDR reports the AT throttle starts at over 8,000ft of altitude. Airspeed is life, altitude is life insurance.
you should have a look at pages 11-15. And include chapter 1.17.3.1 **Upset Prevention and Recovery Training Standard** on page 17-18. Chapter 1.17.4.1 on pages 19-20.
Look at what the very first safety recommendation is on page 28.
There's a lot of lines to read between there.
Two things about aviation accidents that trigger me as in insider are that first everybody blames the pilots, without any information on the accident.
>Oh, a plane crashed? The pilots must have made a mistake.At first I come to defend the pilots, because that's just bullshit, even though often times their performance is a major factor. Let the investigation find out some details for christ sake.
Second, if there's any threat caused by outside factors such as mechanical failure, weather, or whatever.. the pilots magically don't know how to fly and their actions and duties are disregarded as if the airplane was fated to crash.
fuck that noise, everybody isn't automatically dead because a twin engine get experiences what could basically be considered an engine failure ten thousand feet straight up.
this appears a classic case of
>button pushers not watching the most basic instrumentsand I withhold final judgment until the accident investigation concludes, as this is still preliminary information.
