>>1623835actually smart and lets you put the bell elsewhere
like up your ass
>>1623882>>1624000I have one of these. It's ok but then ringing it when there's no bumps around involves shaking my bike from side to side like an idiot. It's also not very loud.
>>1624028Yes that's the point. Alert people who are in the way so they look up, just like you would honk at people backing out in front of you with little warning. Difference is that onna bike you can move around them while a car gotta stop
>>1624046based
>>1624484Illegal where I live. Cops don't care in general I think, but local law is built to combo-fuck you hard with a pile of charges if something does happen.
>>1629457Top bell is the generic chink ringer which is all plastic inside. The pins the gears ride on will break after a few dozen uses
>>1624540>>1624549>>1624553>A jocular saying is that, in England, "everything which is not forbidden is allowed", while, in Germany, the opposite applies, so "everything which is not allowed is forbidden". This may be extended to France—"everything is allowed even if it is forbidden".>The saying about the Germans is at least partially true. In discussion of German Law, an argument often found is that a juristic construction is not applicable since the law doesn't state its existence – even if the law doesn't explicitly state that the construction does not exist. An example for this is the Nebenbesitz (indirect possession of a right by more than one person), which is denied by German courts with the argument that §868 of the Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, which defines indirect possession, doesn't say there could be two people possessing. However, the German constitution Art. 2(1) of the GG protects the general freedom to act (Allgemeine Handlungsfreiheit), as demonstrated e.g. by the judgment of the Bundesverfassungsgericht known as “Reiten im Walde” (BVerfGE 80, 137). 
