>>1730473yeah, it will effectively make you a fag. Im from a rural area turning suburban. There are no young women here. Only 5s who threw themselves into their careers and married another 5 as had some ugly children. As suburban affluent areas attract. After all, if they were particular good looking and actually rich, they'd live in a city.
I'd go visit someone I'd knew in the city, and that is where the 10 pretty girls you went to high school with, and every other area, moved to get a high status man. Sure the rest of the time they are cock catcher/bed warmers with whatever young males are around. I'd take my time with the town bike if you just didnt have to kiss them....but that naturally is a statement on what they are, that they don't like to hear.
There should be attack dogs for "men" you piss everywhere they can get away with. And dilligent feces patrols. Maybe ban dogs cause people can't seem to handle them. I've only found them to be a marker of low character. I know everyone has them......I stand by my statement.
Half your stuff are credits for most people. You just don't sound like a city person. Im not one either. But its not a mistake 70% of the world lives in them. The argument that most do cause they are poor is nonsense. Anyone can walk for the hills.The real problem is parasitic suburbanites trying to have the best of both. All the drawbacks only prove how much people need people that they stay. We have to figure this shit out, there is no other option. Everyone who complains that they are a good dog owner can do live in a dog city where they live with their low character brethren till they learn. Or don't. Idgaf.
