>>1898521Not getting tired of making this bogus claim, aren't you, cagie ?
Motorvehicles and even more so the obsession with motorvehicles very obviously appear to be strongly correlated with poor status and poverty. This is at least valid for first world countries. Fuck tumor has it that in some places homeless people even sleep in their car. Unemployed people who have no wealth, sometimes even debt, and live of wellfare can afford a car in first world countries.
So which is it ? You're a third world shitstani ? Then please reflect on your behaviour and realise you don't need to flex your status that is at best localised relatively good.
Or are you a first world citizen with a social caste that bad that you're actually part of the culture where poors feel the need to flex on poors with posessions, especially motorvehicles ?
I at least know of plenty individuals who are, for first world standards, considered very wealthy and refuse to use or heavily depend on motorcars and don't care about those. At the same time I know no one who can not afford a motorcar.
