>>1957823Assuming you weigh about 80Kg that's 160Kg to carry.
What are you even using to carry that?
And how far?
Why not on a sack/wheel-barrow?
What was it you were carrying?
It's not that I doubt it's possible for an 80Kg man to carry 160Kg on his back, but I find it hard to imagine what it is he'd carry if not specifically steel, fat, short pieces of round stock cutoff or a particularly heavy but dense/low-volume machine.
Can you link a/the cargo backpack you used?
I'm legit curious now, you must be built like a tank, I probably can't carry twice my bodyweight an appreciable distance on my back.
Nit that I ever required that - there was usually some kibd of barrow or cart arou d rather than a backpack that'd eeven survive that.
