>>61Then why was it important for them to intervene in Libya and other places in Africa? Those regions still have mineral resources that were taken as part of colonialist ventures in the past.
You could say Qaddafi was anti-western but after Saddam's fall, he became much more neutral to the West in policy.
I get it has to do with personal security for those nations but it's still insincere when you pitch Syria as a humanitarian crisis that the West is responsible in part for when these areas are like that as well.