>>1295609Good job actually making points.
4chan is mass media. Qanon, to use another example, started on 4chan and was then picked up by a wider audience, and is discussed in the mainstream. It was endorsed by Right Wing mainstream media; my point being that something being on 4chan does not make it an invalid example of propaganda. Pizzagate also got news coverage - mostly negative, but it is an example of how propaganda influenced a large number of people. It's a good example to use because it can be proven to have been demonstrably false: a guy actually went to the place with an assault rifle to save the children who weren't there from the basement that didn't exist.
You show cognitive dissonance within two lines:
>most people aren't insane liberfucks>Democrats have been propagandized completely. They are an afraid and totally demoralized. Default Democrats are the worstThese statements are in opposition to each other. You acknowledge that you can't actually paint all Democrats with the same brush, because they're individuals, and then do exactly that anyway.
I did change the subject! Good work on that ability to read, champ. You consneeded that propaganda works on both sides, which was my original argument, so I moved on. The new argument is that Democrats are MORE propagandized than Republicans. You haven't supplied any real reason that you think that, so I suggested that it's because you've been drinking Right Wing kool-aid and invited you to prove me wrong. Instead, you acted like a little bitch.
That invitation's still open. Tell me WHY Democrats are, on average, more susceptible to propaganda. Your mom is not a valid source.
