Magatards dreams are left seething as Trump gets utterly DOG WALKED by J. Crow or Colorado
https://www.rawstory.com/trump-14th-amendment-colorado-lawmaker?referrer=virped.org Trump isn't qualified to be someone's babysitter, frankly': Colorado lawmaker
A Colorado lawmaker who supports the recently filed lawsuit to take Donald Trump off the ballot is speaking out about the qualifications of the ex-president in addition to the constitutionality
Rep. Jason Crow (D-CO), a previous Army Ranger, serves on the Armed Services and Intelligence Committees in the House. Speaking to MSNBC on Sunday, he explained any viable option should be used to keep Trump off of the ballot in his state
He also explained that he is a witness to what unfolded on Jan. 6 and could serve as a Colorado voter who was personally impacted specifically by the attack
As you might recall, I was one of those members of Congress on January 6 who was surrounded by that violent mob, and trapped there for about 40 minutes before we were rescued," he explained. "So, I saw firsthand the violence, what was happening, and the efforts to derail the democracy. That's clearly what this was, right? Nothing less. They were trying to take over the Capitol. They were trying to interfere with our certification of the election. Full stop."
While this is a legal element to fighting Trump, he said that they're not going to stop their opposition against the former president at the ballot box.
Anonymous
>>1214003 >?referrer=virped.org Who is supposed to be fooled by this?
Anonymous
>>1214013 >Whataboutism Seething trumptard
Anonymous
Quoted By:
The Walls are Closing In.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1214013 Idk man, "virtuous pedo" is pretty hard to believe
Anonymous
>>1214003 We're gonna get him this time!
Anonymous
>>1214079 He's already got
Anonymous
>>1214103 Just like that last twenty dozen times?
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1214111 91 times they failed to take him down? LOL
Anonymous
>>1214112 his organizations have been found fraudulent, he's been found liable and arrested anon. he's been down a few times, you just think it looks like up
Anonymous
>>1214113 By the same justice system that put so many innocent black men in prison for being black men? LOOOOOOL
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1214003 >Trump gets utterly DOG WALKED by J. Crow or Colorado Democrats have a literal politician named Jim Crow.
Imagine
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1214156 yep that seems on brand
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1214103 The fact that they have changed tactics from trying to prosecute, to trying to remove him from the ballot, should inform you of how scared they are that he will win and how much he is paying in rent, to live in their heads! -KEK!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1214156 He makes real Jim Crow look like Jim Eagle.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1214003 >rawstory >referrer=virped.org Imagine being this pathetic.
Anonymous
>>1214079 Let's talk about those other times
>Impeachments Republicans stood in the way of the vote to kick him out.
>Trump U He settled after claiming he wouldn't.
>Trump foundation Paid a hefty fine.
>Access Hollywood Didn't stop his presidency, but later got used as significant evidence leading the fines in the sexual assault case.
>Russia Scandal Got 34 people indicted and arrested including close advisers and his former campaign chair. While he didn't show proof of collision (Mueller claims he was too stupid to realize the Russians were using him and his son), there were several obstruction of Justice charges. This fact would be a serious consideration during the current classified documents fiasco
>Sexual assault deformation suit Lost twice.
>2020 Lost hard due to poor management of Covid
>2022 Backed candidates lost hard as their elections denialism stopped a red wave from happening.
>2024 >5 cases. None of them are being thrown out Sorry man. Unless his buddies in conference intervene again, it's over.
Anonymous
>>1214201 Imagine how much his bills would be if he actually had to pay rent to live in your's and everyone else's head!
Anonymous
>>1214209 >>pay rent easily offset by your mentally unstable coping about libs
Anonymous
>>1214201 >Got 34 people indicted and arrested including close advisers and his former campaign chair. While he didn't show proof of collision (Mueller claims he was too stupid to realize the Russians were using him and his son), there were several obstruction of Justice charges. This fact would be a serious consideration during the current classified documents fiasco Russians went to jail for posting true information on Twitter, not a single person ever indicted from Trump’s campaign was ever indicted for Russian collusion - the fake investigation was a cheap fishing expedition that turned up nothing still, you can’t obstruct justice for a provable witch hunt and no one will blame him for that except feral libs who are delusional enough to fall for a fake investigation that was a proven farce by two other investigations into the investigators, only Biden and Hillary have true document scandals. Trump doesn’t. Presidential records act.
Anonymous
>>1214217 Not him but you know they devoted a whole wikipedia page to what you're doing right now?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russia_investigation_origins_counter-narrative Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1214219 “Wikipedia co-founder says site is now ‘propaganda’ for left-leaning ‘establishment”
>https://nypost.com/2021/07/16/wikipedia-co-founder-says-site-is-now-propaganda-for-left-leaning-establishment/amp/ “Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger has warned that the website can no longer be trusted — insisting it is now just “propaganda” for the left-leaning “establishment.”
Now, he insisted, conservative voices are “sternly warned if not kicked out” if they try to add a different take on establishment views — which Sanger deemed “propaganda.”
“It means that if a controversy does not appear in the mainstream centre-left media, then it’s not going to appear on Wikipedia,” he said.
Now you can only rely on the site to “to give an establishment point of view,” rather than the diverse range of opinions it was set up to give, he insisted.
“If only one version of the facts is allowed then that gives a huge incentive to wealthy and powerful people to seize control of things like Wikipedia in order to shore up their power,” he said.“
Wikipedia, completely co-opted by the intelligence apparatus, made a Wikipedia page to say the intelligence crooks did nothing wrong when the provably did. Kek.
Anonymous
>>1214217 >Russians went to jail for posting true information on Twitter Imagine being so brain-fucked by conservative propaganda that you unironically find yourself defending Russian spies.
Anonymous
>>1214292 I'm not defending Russian spies but I'm also not lying to save your ego. If you see it that way because you have a bastard ego that can't grip with that reality then that's a personal problem. Facts are: American's were already 100% partial to Hillary's scams, scandals, and genocides. Russian posting had no effect on the outcome whatsoever or impacted the truth of the material in public discussions.
Anonymous
>>1214300 >I'm not defending Russian spies You are. They were indicted and found guilty for wire fraud, identity fraud, money laundering and operating as unregistered agents on American soil and you're defending them. Convicted Russian criminals. Take some time to reflect about your life and the propaganda you've allowed to infect your brain.
Anonymous
>>1214302 And what about this contradicts the true information about Hillary and Obama admin scams, scandals, and genocides published by Wikileaks that sunk Hillary's campaign?
>Hillary gets caught red handed >Americans discuss it >This is Russia's fault Kek
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1214304 we know, we're american
Anonymous
>>1214304 >And what about this contradicts the true information about Hillary and Obama admin scams, scandals, and genocides published by Wikileaks that sunk Hillary's campaign? Whataboutism. You're desperately trying to pivot away from this topic because you know you don't have an argument. This conversation, currently, is about you defending the convicted Russian criminals who were committing crimes as unregistered foreign agents in the U.S. They were charged with and found guilty of wire fraud, identify theft, money laundering and operating as unregistered foreign agents. Nothing we're speaking about has anything to do with Hillary, Obama or Wikileaks. Stay on subject. If you try to pivot away I'm just going to pivot right back.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1214320 >criminals who were committing crimes as unregistered foreign agents in the U.S. ... oh hunter biden
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1214324 I know it's obvious he's an unregistered foreign agent, but tell that to the libbots
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1214212 I'm coping just fine. Ithink you are about due for another tanker truck of copium though.
Better stock up, before inFAKEtion takes ahold of it too!
Anonymous
>>1214330 unveiling the new right wing cringe?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1214331 The hits never stop coming
Anonymous
>>1214331 Nope, just LMFAO as all of you, righties and lefties get BTFO by the real power... Capitalist Corporate Governance.
Anonymous
>>1214333 didn't translate well
Anonymous
>>1214334 Let me help you with your brain damage... It doesn't really matter which side you vote for, they are all puppets, on strings, attached to the same rigging, and manipulated for your entertainment, and to help you feel like you have a say in the government.
They are all controlled by the same puppet masters though... Corporations!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1214302 Are you talking about the black socialist movement which was accused of defrauding the US government for supporting Russia in the Ukraine-Russia war?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1214336 did you just figure that out
Anonymous
>>1214336 >"MUH BOTH SIDES" Fucking braindead, anon. Stay out of political conversations. You have nothing of value to add.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1214339 Not adding... Just laughing! Take another bong rip on that copium anon!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1214302 >wire fraud, identity fraud, money laundering and operating as unregistered agents on American soil ...hunter Biden?
Anonymous
>>1214320 >This conversation, currently, is about you defending the convicted Russian criminals who were committing crimes as unregistered foreign agents in the U.S. They were charged with and found guilty of wire fraud, identify theft, money laundering and operating as unregistered foreign agents. But I didn’t defend them. I just said the information you’re seething about that they posted one twitter was already being posted a million times over by actual Americans and discussed by Americans. Russians posted didnt unearth anything we weren’t already aware of and didn’t make the information any less true.
>Nothing we're speaking about has anything to do with Hillary, Obama or Wikileaks. Yes it does anon. It’s all one topic. You’re crying Russians were in the US posting on Twitter on behalf of Russia. Twitters largest shareholder was the Saudi prince who was bankrolling Hillary’s campaign and on the other side you had the same big tech censorship scam occurring in your favor. You’re inability to consider all aspects, and the scope of the influence in either direction, means you’re a retard.
>It doesn't really matter which side you vote for, they are all puppets, on strings, attached to the same rigging, and manipulated for your entertainment, and to help you feel like you have a say in the government. This was true until Trump changed it all in 2016. MAGA vs the uniparty (Bush, Hillary, Cheney, Obama, Romney, McCain, Pelosi, McConnell, Schumer). Why do leftwing retards always pretend the uniparty vs MAGA is the only reality conforming dynamic? Are you mad that you were golems for the bad guys who turned you into scientific tranny experiments with their fag psyops? It’s not too late to not cut your dick off if you haven’t already and start being a better, more honest normal non faggot.
Anonymous
>>1214352 >But I didn’t defend them. I just said the information you’re seething about that they posted one twitter was already being posted a million times over by actual Americans and discussed by Americans. Firstly, this is a lie - they were caught spreading false information about the election such as giving out the wrong dates and poll times to Democrat voters and generating false stories posing as Democrat political organizations. Secondly, even if you were correct, operating as an unregistered foreign agent, wire fraud, identity fraud and money laundering are illegal.
>Yes it does anon. It’s all one topic. Its not. You're desperately trying to pivot away to different topics because you know you don't have an argument for this one. I'm not talking about Twitter or Big Tech or Hillary. We're talking about the Russian nationals found guilty for crimes related to election interference. I'm going to ignore anything you say that isn't directly about this topic. No pivoting allowed.
Anonymous
>>1214355 >Secondly, even if you were correct, operating as an unregistered foreign agent, wire fraud, identity fraud and money laundering are illegal. Literally anybody who has ever lied on 4chan can be charged for 3/4ths of the things you listed, idiot.
Anonymous
>>1214357 >Literally anybody who has ever lied on 4chan can be charged for 3/4ths of the things you listed, idiot. Lying on a scandinavian hackey sack forum isn't against the law. Wire fraud, identity theft and money laundering are against the law.
Anonymous
>>1214359 >Wire fraud, identity theft and money laundering are against the law... unless you’re a democrat Anonymous
>>1214371 You're pivoting again. No whatboutism, anon. To help you keep on track I'll send you an article containing the full indictment against the 12 Russian officers.
>https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/read-muellers-full-indictment-against-12-russian-officers-for-election-interference Anonymous
>>1214359 Sending false information across the internet is wire fraud anon. You could also be charged with identity theft and acting as an unregistered foreign agent if you tried to impersonate someone from a foreign country.
Those Russians were charged with shitposting using Russian memes.
Anonymous
>>1214377 >Sending false information across the internet is wire fraud anon False. Wire fraud is financial fraud using the internet or telecommunications as a means. You and I both know lying on the internet is not wire fraud. I have no idea why you're pretending to be this retarded.
>You could also be charged with identity theft and acting as an unregistered foreign agent if you tried to impersonate someone from a foreign country False again. Firstly have to be a foreign agent to be charged with acting as an unregistered foreign agent. You also have to be engaged in activity that requires foreign agents to be registered i.e. lobbying, representing foreign interests etc.. Secondly, identity theft is not "pretending to be another person" online. Identity theft is fraudulently acquiring someone's personal information then using that information for some sort of gain. RP'ing as Brad Pitt in a discord is not identity theft. Hacking Brad Pitt's computer and using his personal e-mail to convince girls to send you nudes is identity theft. Big difference. Although, I think you know the difference. I think you're just pretending to be retarded because this "the russians didn't do anything" meme you're shilling pushes your political narrative.
>Those Russians were charged with shitposting using Russian meme Again, imagine being so brain-fucked by conservative propaganda that you unironically find yourself defending Russian agents committing crimes on U.S. soil.
Anonymous
>>1214355 >they were caught spreading false information about the election such as giving out the wrong dates and poll times to Democrat voters and generating false stories posing as Democrat political organizations. Only n****** would fall for this and they barely vote anyways. You’re seething over something so negligible it’s grasping at straws. Unless votes were hacked to be changed or actual damaging disinfo (like the Russian Steele dossier Hillary used or the 51 former intel agents abusing their authority and influence to defraud the public) was distributed en mass it’s not a worthwhile point.
Secondly, even if you were correct, operating as an unregistered foreign agent, wire fraud, identity fraud and money laundering are illegal.
No it’s not apparently. Daddy Joe saved Hunter and set that precedent. Precedent matters and calling it whataboutism is seething. Whataboutism can be a good argument if you can make it into one especially since whataboutism is a pseudo synonym for precedent.
>You're desperately trying to pivot away to different topics because you know you don't have an argument for this one. I'm not talking about Twitter or Big Tech or Hillary. We're talking about the Russian nationals found guilty for crimes related to election interference. I’m not pivoting. Im calling out your garbage and negligible seething for what it is and showing you how much worse of an offender you and your side is for it. Cope, seethe, dilate.
Anonymous
>>1214372 Whataboutism is a fine tactic if you can make a good argument for it that’s intertwined into the topic at hand. Seethe cope dilate
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
i can only imagine this thread sucks
Anonymous
>>1214394 >Only n****** would fall for this and they barely vote anyways The likelihood of someone falling for a scam has nothing to do with whether or not someone is a scammer. Its illegal to defraud voters in the U.S. You're just defending crime.
>You’re seething over something so negligible it’s grasping at straws. Unless votes were hacked to be changed or actual damaging disinfo (like the Russian Steele dossier Hillary used or the 51 former intel agents abusing their authority and influence to defraud the public) was distributed en mass it’s not a worthwhile point. I like how you got completely blown the fuck out on the facts of the event so now the only cope you can come up with is "well, its not even that big of a deal!". Foreign governments committing crimes on U.S. soil for the purpose of interfering in an election is a pretty big deal to pretty much everyone. You're defending crime again. All because its inconvenient to your political narrative.
>No it’s not apparently. Daddy Joe saved Hunter and set that precedent. Precedent matters and calling it whataboutism is seething. Whatboutism. We're talking about the 12 Russian nationals but you have no argument against that so you're pivoting to a completely unrelated topic. Also, the Russians interfered in the 2016 election.The Hunter Biden shit wasn't until 2020. Usually something that is a "precedent" has to happen before another incident. You can't set a precedent for something in the past, you fucking idiot.
>I’m not pivoting You're pivoting. We're talking about one topic but because you don't have an argument you're trying to pivot to a completely different topic.
Anonymous
>>1214406 >Whatboutism. We're talking about the 12 Russian nationals Umm anon that's not what this thread is about.
You can't just whatabout whatever tf you want and then accuse everyone else of whatabouting when they talk about another related topic
You people are so dumb, you try to control conversation you don't like because you can't engage with it.
You made an example, he made a counter example, fucking deal with it
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1214395 >Whataboutism is a fine tactic It isn't. That's why its a logical fallacy.
>if you can make a good argument for it that’s intertwined into the topic at hand If you use a related topic for the purpose of formulating an argument for the topic at hand then it isn't whatboutism, retard.
Anonymous
>>1214408 >Umm anon that's not what this thread is about. See
>>1214217 This is the post that sparked the whole back and fourth. If you're not going to pay attention to the thread then don't jump in, anon. It just derails conversation.
>You people are so dumb, you try to control conversation you don't like because you can't engage with it. If by "control the conversation" you mean stay on one topic then yes, I am trying to control the conversation. I'm not going to let the people I'm speaking to run away to a million different topics because they don't have an argument for the one we're talking about.
>You made an example, he made a counter example, fucking deal with it Pivoting to an irrelevant topic isn't a counter example. Its called whatboutism.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1214379 >Wire fraud is financial fraud using the internet or telecommunications as a means. No, it's not. It's broadly related to any sort of fraudulent gain via the submission of false information over the internet.
For example, an underage user bypassing the "are you over 18?" notification on the front of 4chan would be considered an example of wire fraud, because that user would be falsifying their age to gain access to 4chan.
>Firstly have to be a foreign agent to be charged with acting as an unregistered foreign agent. You also have to be engaged in activity that requires foreign agents to be registered i.e. lobbying, representing foreign interests etc.. And who determines when someone is acting as an "unregistered foreign agent", retard? Could it possibly be the US government? The same one which has asserted that any argument which runs contrary to US interventionism is Russian disinformation?
>Identity theft is fraudulently acquiring someone's personal information then using that information for some sort of gain. Social media impersonation IS identity theft, you colossal faggot.
Anonymous
>>1214406 >The likelihood of someone falling for a scam has nothing to do with whether or not someone is a scammer. Its illegal to defraud voters in the U.S. You're just defending crime. True and if Russia was the only country guilty of this you would have a point but you don’t because it’s not an isolated case, you are just hyper fixated on it for cope’s sake. So when you screech about Russia but China, Saudi princes, and any other countries with pocket change to throw at a few pajeets had their hand in the same in other way, and to a much larger and significant degree, it looks retarded.
They built the Russia collusion narrative for leverage and it was fake the whole time.
When it didn’t work, they had to scramble because besides using it for an excuse for their loss, they also had to sell its legitimacy to justify using intelligence services to spy on Trump’s campaign and save themselves from the largest scandal in American history.
Faggots like you hyperfixate on it for cope and the DNC needed it to stick to save their asses. That is the only reason it’s an a thing and they went all out to mak a scene of arresting a measley 12 Russians for posting on twitter and other crimes.
>"well, its not even that big of a deal!". Foreign governments committing crimes on U.S. soil for the purpose of interfering in an election is a pretty big deal to pretty much everyone. What are you talking about faggot my position was always “it happened but it wasn’t a big deal” because it did happen but it’s effects were negligible and the activity was not unique. Russia was one of many countries they just clinged to it for dear life to save face. If one side wasn’t such partisan slaves and saw/understood the implications of rogue career bureaucrats using invasive and illegal means to retain power in America after they spent two decades chipping away at rights after the patriot act they would, and should have, been introduced to the guillotine.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1214412 >Umm anon that's not what this thread is about. See >>1214217 (You) # This is the post that sparked the whole back and fourth. And I was responding to someone else who was the first to go off topic. So you didn’t even highlight the right post (intentionally no doubt).
>Pivoting to an irrelevant topic isn't a counter example. Its called whatboutism I never pivoted. The broader context and topic was
>Russians went to jail for posting true information on Twitter, not a single person ever indicted from Trump’s campaign was ever indicted for Russian collusion - the fake investigation was a cheap fishing expedition that turned up nothing still, you can’t obstruct justice for a provable witch hunt and no one will blame him for that except feral libs who are delusional enough to fall for a fake investigation that was a proven farce by two other investigations into the investigators, only Biden and Hillary have true document scandals. Trump doesn’t. Presidential records act. You narrowed it down with goalpost moving and being hyperfixated on your narrow scope (and still lost).
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1214406 >Also, the Russians interfered in the 2016 election.The Hunter Biden shit wasn't until 2020. Usually something that is a "precedent" has to happen before another incident. You can't set a precedent for something in the past, you fucking idiot. Oh that’s right how could I forget it was Hillary walking from her own investigations that set that precedent. Thank you for reminding me.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1214430 Wheeewww! You two just need to get a hotel room and shag each other in the stink hole already!
Motel 6 probably would even give you hourly rates!
Tell you what...I'll even run by Walmart and grab a bucket of Crisco for you!
Bradley Abrams, Uklahoma Oblast
Quoted By:
>>1214114 Trump isn’t black you doublenigger.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1214430 Worst poster on the entire board
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1214027 >uses term invented to excuse hypocrisy nice try libshit go back to your basement
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Is it just the faggots and mentally ill heshe's that still approve of Biden? I hate Trump but I'd happily welcome him back over this wrinkly old puppet shambling around blatantly saying he's taking orders. I assume they're the only people still thinking Biden is doing well right because they get to be mentally ill in public and nobody can say anything under this administration?
Anonymous
