/news/ - News » Thread #1240590

[21 / 1 / 10]

831KiB, 860x582, 231128-george-santos-mjf-1319-9e5d91.png

Congressional Republicans finally figuring out George Santos is con artist

Anonymous Wed 29 Nov 2023 02:21:00 No.1240590 View View Reply Original Report

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/rep-george-santos-expulsion-vote-house-this-week-rcna127018

Rep. George Santos will face expulsion again this week and predicts he'll be ousted

WASHINGTON — House lawmakers took steps Tuesday to force a vote to expel indicted Rep. George Santos, R-N.Y., from Congress this week — the second time this month he will face an expulsion vote.

Santos, who admitted to lying about his background and has pleaded not guilty to multiple federal charges, easily survived a vote to oust him on Nov. 1. But he predicts he will be removed from office this time around.

Many lawmakers who voted against expulsion now say they will support it following the release of a damning Ethics Committee report on Santos just before the Thanksgiving recess.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 29 Nov 2023 02:21:31 No.1240592 Report

Quoted By:

A supermajority vote, or two-thirds, is required to expel a member from Congress.

Shortly after the 56-page Santos report was issued, House Ethics Committee Chairman Michael Guest, R-Miss., introduced a resolution to expel the embattled congressman. As lawmakers returned to Washington on Tuesday night, Rep. Anthony D’Esposito — one of several New York Republicans who've been leading the charge to oust their freshman colleague — stipulated on the House floor that the Guest resolution was now "privileged."

That means GOP leadership must bring it to the floor for a vote within two legislative days.

"He lied his way here. He's a fraud. And the quicker we can rid him of this institution, the better," D'Esposito told reporters outside the Capitol. "I think his days are numbered."

The resolution could be tabled or referred to a committee before it gets a floor vote. Guest told reporters Tuesday that he had coordinated with the New York delegation to ensure that they could participate in the effort to remove Santos. He said he didn't know if it would pass but called supporting it "the right thing to do."

"Every member will have to vote their conscience," Guest said. "If you look at the content of the 50-plus-page ethics report, along with a pending federal indictment, I think that there's clearly, at least in my mind as a former prosecutor, enough evidence at this point to expel Mr. Santos from Congress."

Guest added that GOP leadership has not taken a position on the expulsion resolution.

Earlier in the day, Democratic Rep. Robert Garcia of California filed a competing privileged expulsion resolution in a bid to pressure Republicans to punish Santos. But because Republicans control the chamber, it's expected the GOP resolution authored by Guest will be brought to the floor first.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 29 Nov 2023 02:22:32 No.1240593 Report

Quoted By:

In May, Garcia tried to force a vote on a similar resolution to expel Santos, but the House voted to refer it to the Ethics Committee instead, triggering a monthslong congressional investigation into Santos.
“We’re calling on Mike Johnson, the speaker, to come out and tell his members that he's going to support the expulsion,” Garcia told reporters earlier Tuesday.

He was joined on the floor by Democratic Rep. Dan Goldman, a former federal prosecutor who serves in the New York delegation with Santos.

“We’re tired of waiting. We’re tired of the games that Republicans have played to protect George Santos and their slim majority,” Goldman said. “And it’s time to put up or shut up.”

The blistering Ethics report on Santos concluded that he had deceived his donors, knowingly filed false campaign finance statements and used his campaign funds to pay for personal expenses, including rent, trips, luxury items, cosmetic treatments like Botox and a subscription to the adult content site OnlyFans.

Santos has denied any wrongdoing and pleaded not guilty to the federal charges. Santos said on X that he told Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., he would be “standing for the expulsion vote” and warned his colleagues that they would be setting a bad precedent if they ousted him before he goes to trial in September.

Santos said Tuesday evening that Johnson had "made a point to say that he was not calling me to ask me to resign" and asked whether he'd made a decision about facing potential expulsion.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 29 Nov 2023 02:23:32 No.1240595 Report

Quoted By:

"I said yes. I mean, put up or shut up at this point," Santos said.

Rep. Kevin Hern, R-Okla., who was in a leadership meeting with Johnson on Tuesday evening, said Johnson told other Republicans about the call. “It’s our understanding that the speaker and George have had conversations up until recently even an hour ago, about the right thing possibly to do for him will be to examine the position and resign," Hern told reporters after he left the speaker’s office.

Asked whether Johnson encouraged Santos to resign, Hern clarified: “He did not say that. He said that that would be certainly an option that would prevent a lot of people from having to take some very tough votes.”

In modern times, the House has expelled just two members, but only after they were convicted of federal crimes.

“Expel me and set the precedent so we can see who the judge, jury and executioners in Congress are,” Santos said on X.

The precedent argument isn’t resonating with some lawmakers. Former Ethics Committee Chair Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., voted against expulsion this month to give her former panel time to complete its wide-ranging report. But she said in a lengthy statement Tuesday that she was now prepared to expel Santos given that the report was detailed in nature and backed unanimously by the bipartisan committee.

“Precedents of the House are important guidelines to ensure proper, consistent actions,” Lofgren said. “But every precedent had a first time, and precedents should not prevent the House from acting when prudence dictates the creation of a new precedent or a variation from precedent.”

“In the matter of Rep. Santos,” she added, “rigid adherence to the requirement of a felony conviction prior to expulsion would, in essence, delegate the responsibilities of the legislative branch to the executive and judicial branches.”

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 29 Nov 2023 02:24:33 No.1240598 Report

Quoted By:

Santos’ team also makes the argument that Republicans who support his ouster would undermine the GOP’s already razor-thin majority and could risk a government shutdown when funding for some agencies runs out in mid-January and the rest lapses in early February.

“The Santos team is confident the House GOP will not compromise the critical work of funding the government by testing the strength of an already tenuous margin for majority,” a congressional GOP source said.

Johnson, who declined to comment about Santos on Tuesday, already doesn’t have much wiggle room to pass legislation. Republican Celeste Maloy of Utah will be sworn in Tuesday night, filling the seat left vacant after GOP Rep. Chris Stewart resigned. With Maloy sworn in, the House will be back at full capacity with 435 members — 222 Republicans and 213 Democrats.

Removing Santos would lower the GOP majority back to 221. Meanwhile, Rep. Bill Johnson, R-Ohio, said he will leave Congress in a few months to accept a job as a college president. That would lower the majority to 220.

If any other Republicans resign early, it would narrow the majority even further. Former Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., has said that he won’t resign and that he intends to serve out his full term. But if he did leave early, it would make Johnson’s job managing the conference even more difficult.
___

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 29 Nov 2023 02:26:38 No.1240600 Report

Quoted By: >>1240622

>>1240590
they shouldnt care, we need every vote stop kicking republicans out, stupid gop.

catch me, you can

catch me, you can Wed 29 Nov 2023 03:04:41 No.1240622 Report

Quoted By: >>1240936

>>1240600
They know he's a con man.
They look at the cost/benefit ratio of keeping him around.
Same as the Dems and Menendez.

politics is a slimey profession

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 29 Nov 2023 05:13:24 No.1240648 Report

Quoted By:

Can't Reps have firearms in Congress? They sure they want to throw this guy out? Not like he'll have much to live for if they do. Wouldn't be the first time a mentally unstable sociopath shot up their place of work the day they were canned.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 29 Nov 2023 05:32:27 No.1240651 Report

Quoted By:

Everybody lies on their resume why are we having such a fit about Santos? He does his job fine. He represents his constituents well by voting in their interests. It is starting to seem like a witch hunt.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 29 Nov 2023 14:17:41 No.1240729 Report

Quoted By: >>1240762

>>1240590
I'm starting to become concerned with the sheer number of activist groups Democrats have.
What normal protesters make a stupid George Santos balloon?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 29 Nov 2023 17:22:24 No.1240762 Report

Quoted By:

>>1240729
Anything to distract from the fact that republicans are easy marks for con artists (like Trump and Santos)

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 29 Nov 2023 23:23:04 No.1240936 Report

Quoted By: >>1241015

>>1240622
>Same as the Dems and Menendez.
Dems are demanding Menendez resign at least. How long have Republicans been defending Santos and even voted against the first attempt to remove him?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 30 Nov 2023 04:37:40 No.1241015 Report

Quoted By: >>1241043

>>1240936
>How long have Republicans been defending Santos
Since never.
The first attempt was intended by Dems to cause more drama since the ethics report hadn't completed yet.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 30 Nov 2023 07:56:11 No.1241043 Report

Quoted By: >>1241058

>>1241015
Right it was the Dems who caused the drama and not the republican con man

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 30 Nov 2023 08:44:55 No.1241058 Report

Quoted By: >>1241060

>>1241043
Well, they're the ones with the stupid fucking balloon out there trying to make it a big controversy, aren't they?
So yeah, I agree with your assessment.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 30 Nov 2023 09:01:50 No.1241060 Report

Quoted By: >>1241064

>>1241058
I hate to be the one to tell you but it was already a big controversy before the balloon. You're taking the effect of the problem and making it the cause.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 30 Nov 2023 09:38:08 No.1241064 Report

Quoted By: >>1241065 >>1241815

>>1241060
Not really. Democrat pay to play schemes are a much bigger controversy but there's way less backlash over them every single time.
Never once have I seen a balloon dedicated to the likes of say, Rod Blagojevic.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 30 Nov 2023 09:41:22 No.1241065 Report

Quoted By: >>1241498

>>1241064
just take your licks you wriggly faggots, so much fucking whining

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 01 Dec 2023 15:46:30 No.1241498 Report

Quoted By: >>1241572

>>1241065
This response makes it clear that Democrats do not have the best interests of America in mind and that they are uninterested in fair debate or argument. It's not already unknown... but shows how there is no recourse but violence and war. If none is given, then they win by default and likely will kill all who opposed them. As is done all throughout history...

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 01 Dec 2023 19:42:35 No.1241572 Report

Quoted By:

>>1241498
>This response makes it clear that Democrats do not have the best interests of America in mind and that they are uninterested in fair debate or argument.
This is hilarious coming from the party who thinks "owning the libs" is a valid party platform.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 02 Dec 2023 14:29:34 No.1241815 Report

Quoted By:

>>1241064
>Never once have I seen a balloon dedicated to the likes of say, Rod Blagojevic
You mean, the guy that was nearly unanimously impeached within a month of getting arrested and unanimously convicted within a month after that (as opposed to Santos, who was finally expelled like seven months after his federal indictment, after surviving multiple expulsion votes beforehand)? You mean, the guy who got his federal felony sentence commuted by Trump?

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches

Congressional Republicans finally figuring out George Santos is con artist