Tucker Carlson launches new subscription site
BY NICK ROBERTSON - 12/09/23 9:44 PM ET
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/4352098-tucker-carlson-launches-new-subscription-site/ Tucker Carlson announced a new subscription site for his content on Saturday, providing a way for fans to pay for more from the former Fox News host.
Carlson was ousted from Fox News in April over criticism of company management and has since hosted a periodical news and political commentary show for free on X, formerly Twitter
“We’ve been out of work for seven or eight months now, hard to know. Time flies when you’re unemployed,” Carlson joked in a video announcement. “But actually, we have been working in secret and producing an awful lot of material for months now, interviews, et cetera.”
“And all of it has now found its way to
Tuckercarlson.com ,” he said. “We’re launching a brand new thing very soon. And we’d love for you to see it.”
Carlson has already hosted interviews with former President Trump, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and others on his X show.
The news site isn’t up and running yet, but allows fans to purchase an annual subscription for $72, which comes out to $6 per month.
“We’re just days away from the launch of Tucker Carlson’s new streaming platform,” the site reads.
It promises access to “hours” of exclusive interviews and other content as well as “limited edition” merchandise.
theoneboomer arithmeticsitsself
>>1244260 $72 a yr when I use to get him for free on cable?
Sounds great!
Let's see
10,000 boomers like me at $72 a yr = $720,000
Since tuck is already rich, he aint in it for the $, so he should charge 2¢ a month or 24¢ a yr.
This will get him 100M boomers like me and 240K a yr
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244260 Honestly pretty good idea for him and a legit business model; unlike bot-driven advertising revenue through some bullshit like YouTube or even X.
Anybody depending on another company's "magic math" for their pay check is eventually going to be broke as fuck.
Anonymous
>>1244270 Yes you got him for free on cable after paying 1200 dollars a year for cable.
But anyway, I can't see this being popular.
The current Internet standard is free content with the option to pay to support the content.
Tucker did/does have a huge following, but still does that translate to nearly a Disney+ priced subscription fee?
Doubtful.
Anonymous
>>1244305 Bruh Disney is 8$/month with ads. 11$/month without.
Anonymous
>>1244306 You say that like it's a bargain. Keep in mind they aren't actually selling you anything but temporary access to their digital works.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244260 Who would want to stay dependent on Elon "Cybertruck" Musk for a revenue stream? The only unexpected thing is that Tucker couldn't come up with a catchy enough name and decided to use "
Tuckercarlson.com ".
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244346 No, I'm saying Disney is currently charging way more than what Tucker is asking for; I can't imagine paying for a streaming service and then still watch ads.
Anonymous
>>1244260 Retard republicans will pay for anything to own da libs
Anonymous
>>1244398 Owning da libs is a winning strategy though.
Anonymous
How am I gonna afford DailyWire+ and Tucker Carlson?!?!
Anonymous
>>1244402 >The strategy of owning the libs has been criticized by both liberal and conservative observers as an unsuccessful strategy, or as leading only to counterproductive Pyrrhic victory. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owning_the_libs Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244508 Just cancel your PragerU, FoxNation, and Newsmax Platinum subscriptions
Anonymous
>>1244509 >trannypedia Discarded. Try harder next time retard.
Anonymous
>>1244616 Do you think they made it up?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244616 It's not going away. No one cares if you discarded it.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244402 Retard republicans lost embarrassingly in 2020 and barely got a win in 2022
Anonymous
>>1244617 Wikipedia is famous for being edited and maintained by left wing activists and basement trannies.
With libs you lose. Owned libs means lack of homelessness, lack of poverty, and prosperity.
>B-but I don't like homelessness and poverty!!! Yeah? Then stop making it happen, libshit.
Anonymous
>>1244649 >The right is pretending to care about the homeless and poverty again Just go back to being capitalist. It was more logical.
Anonymous
>>1244653 He's right tho.
Republicans don't deal with homelessness because their policies don't encourage it
They don't allow public drug use, they don't make theft easy... Their societies have a pressure on people to be productive rather than this "laissezz faire" attitude towards drugs crimes and homelessness
Anonymous
>>1244654 2023 Joke Post of the Year™
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Finally, something to subscribe to. See you faggots on the other side.
Anonymous
>>1244659 I mean he's right though.
The so-called poor states don't have major homeless problems.
Now, I know it's probably not intentional, but Democrats seem to like to create homelessness, then funnel government money into fixing a problem they caused without addressing the root issues of homelessness.
Treating the symptom of the disease of the Democratic party is also popular with Democrats. Weird people.
Anonymous
>>1244906 You have been misled.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244906 >Now, I know it's probably not intentional, but Democrats seem to like to create homelessness, then funnel government money into fixing a problem they caused without addressing the root issues of homelessness. >Treating the symptom of the disease of the Democratic party is also popular with Democrats Good post
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244654 Good post as well
Anonymous
>>1244906 >The so-called poor states don't have major homeless problems Its because nobody wants to live there, anon.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244931 Uh. Most have growing populations, whereas the places where "people want to live" have shrinking populations.
https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/population-decline-by-state Explain, shitpost faggot.
Anonymous
>>1244906 Poor states don't have homeless problems because the poor would rather live in NYC homeless than be rural redneck filth
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244944 Nice support for the working man, comrade.
Anonymous
>>1244944 >Homeless people just moved to another state, yo. Because, it's like, easier and shit. >Works cited: my crack pipe Studies have shown most homeless people live in the same county before becoming homeless
Turns out it's tough to move states without any cash or places to live
Anonymous
>>1244402 winning strategy for what? tax cuts for billionaires? okay...
epic win, anon. great job
Anonymous
>>1244950 Nonsense, we all know busing programs exist and have existed for a long time.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244984 Which is why it was such an outrage when Texas recently started sending them to other places.
Anonymous
>>1244977 Well, I sure wish I could say exactly what it was that made Democrat policies so bad.
However, attempting to fix every single problem with taxes is one of them.
Taxes are a parasitic practice that causes everyone to have to work harder.
And it's odd we bring them up since the current status quo of the Democratic party is to create problems, create taxes to fix them, then funnel tax dollars to corporations to administer the programs.
Billionaires you hate obviously hate this. That's why they all donate to the Democratic party. You're a fucking sucker, faggot.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244270 In America its always about the money. Every time. If someone tells you they aren't in it for the money they're literally doing it while charging for that shit. Every time.
Anonymous
>>1244306 >cartoons cost less than in depth intellectual discussions about politics and society Yes
Anonymous
>>1245150 >depth intellectual discussions about politics and society Tucker Carlson has a cartoon understanding of politics
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1245019 >pretends to be for the working class while simping for billionaires okay anon, you're right. i'm the sucker. you're NOT a useful idiot doing the bidding of the elite for free, no siree.
ps daddy jeff bezos if very proud of you. he says to keep up the good work, son :)
Anonymous