Biden: “I've never discussed my son's business with him.”
NARA: "Heres 16,000 email messages+attachments totalling 62,000 pages of Vice President Biden and Hunter Biden communicating with each other about Burisma and Ukraine while Joe was in office"
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/biden-impeachment-inquiry-national-archives-provides-comer-emails Biden impeachment inquiry: National Archives to provide 1,799 emails to Comer
EXCLUSIVE — The National Archives and Record Administration said Monday it will make available more than 62,000 pages of records for the House GOP impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden.
Back in August, House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-KY) asked for unrestricted special access to unredacted emails and documents from Joe Biden’s time as vice president regarding Hunter Biden and Burisma. While some of the emails were previously released, they were heavily redacted and provided little context of the substance of the email.
Specifically, Comer requested the unredacted version of all emails released by the National Archives under “Case Number 2023-0022-F,” which is titled on NARA’s website as “Email Messages To and/or From Vice President Biden and Hunter Biden related to Burisma and Ukraine."
After a review of the documents, NARA said that it has agreed to turn over 1,799 emails and attachments requested by Comer which totals 62,210 pages, the agency said in a Dec. 11 letter obtained by the Washington Examiner.
Now NARA has agreed to turn over an extensive trove of documents but asked that Comer “protect such information from public disclosure” as they include personal information.
There are two other requests Comer made that he claims the agency has not complied with including one on Aug. 30 and another on Sept. 6
Anonymous
Quoted By:
“The White House is trying to make an appearance of cooperation after two brave IRS whistleblowers provided information revealing Joe Biden used an alias as Vice President to email directly with Hunter Biden’s business associate," Comer said in a statement Monday. "Just last week, President Biden lied again when confronted with information that he interacted with his family’s business associates. The White House must comply with all of our requests for records from Joe Biden’s time as Vice President and all other Committee requests related to the impeachment inquiry. Anything less is obstruction.”
The impeachment inquiry is looking into whether Biden improperly used his position of power to enrich himself and his family, whether he used his influence to pressure the Department of Justice to help his son Hunter Biden, and how involved he was in his family's foreign business dealings.
It also focuses on an allegation raised in an FBI tip sheet that says Joe Biden, along with Hunter Biden, took bribes from Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company for which Hunter Biden was a board member, to pressure the Ukrainian government to fire a prosecutor.
The House is expected to vote to authorize the inquiry this week
https://www.scribd.com/document/691609033/NARA-letter-to-Comer Anonymous
>>1244759 >but his emails! You people have even less originality than modern Hollywood
Anonymous
>>1244769 >Give me proof >No wait not that kind Anonymous
>>1244770 Next you'll say Hunter did Benghazi and took money from the Saudis for his foundation
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>washingtonexaminer
Anonymous
>>1244771 Yeah, it is pretty unbelievable that both Clinton and Biden would get busted for emails; it's such a rare form of communication these days.
Anonymous
>https://www.archives.gov/files/research/vice-presidential-records/pdfs/2023-0022-f-finding-aid.pdf >Extent >Four email messages >This series contains email messages to or from Vice President Biden and his son Hunter Biden related to Ukraine and Burisma. The email messages, dated May 27, 2016 and June 15, 2016, are from Aide to
the Vice President John S. Flynn to Vice President Biden with Hunter Biden as a carbon copied
recipient
So, to be clear, it's 4 emails, Biden didn't send them, and Hunter was just CC'd.
Fact checks are a bitch.
Anonymous
>>1244774 >it's 4 emails, Says that one pdf file. How do you know there aren't additional foia requests? In fact, where is your source that it only includes four emails?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244759 >washingtonexaminer One of the many retard rightwinger sites that went apeshit over benghazi and buttery males. Why are republicans such suckers? They wind you guys up with these stories and set you up for disappointment.
Anonymous
>>1244777 >How do you know there aren't additional foia requests? Because they're individually numbered and that's the one from the article.
>Specifically, Comer requested the unredacted version of all emails released by the National Archives under “Case Number 2023-0022-F,” which is titled on NARA’s website as “Email Messages To and/or From Vice President Biden and Hunter Biden related to Burisma and Ukraine." Anonymous
>>1244782 So huge assumptions based on your reading of exactly one article?
Bro.
Anonymous
>>1244773 >partisan hacks calling a congressional hearing is "busted" now Funny how you didn't say that during the 1/6 hearings
Anonymous
>>1244782 If you read the letter at the end of post 2 you would know that they specifically requested unredacted versions of those emails but that isn't the only request being made. It's only one of many.
Anonymous
Have they figured out what crime Biden supposedly committed, or are they still being vague about it while fishing through all these documents hoping to find something remotely incriminating?
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1244782 >>1244791 1. Complete, unredacted versions of all documents from Case Number 2023-0022-F;
2. Any document or communication in which a pseudonym for Vice President Joe Biden was included either as a sender, recipient, copied or was included in the contents of the document or communication, including but not limited to Robert Peters, Robin Ware, and JRB Ware;
3. Any document or communication in which Hunter Biden, Eric Schwerin, or Devon Archer was included either as a sender, recipient, copied, or was included in the contents of the document or communication; a
4. All drafts from November 1, 2015 to December 9, 2015 of then-Vice President Biden’sspeech delivered to the Ukrainian Rada on December 9, 2015
Anonymous
>>1244788 >If you read the letter at the end of post 2 you would know that they specifically requested unredacted versions of those emails Kay? It's still 4 emails.
>but that isn't the only request being made. Kay, the article makes no mention of documents connected to Hunter, Ukraine, and Burisma.
For all you know the remaining documents are vice presidential itineraries. The article tried to associated all the docs being turned over to Hunter, Joe, Ukraine, and Burisma, but that only describes 4 such documents.
>>1244783 Do you have another article showing more than 4 emails connecting Joe Biden to communications with his son about Ukraine and Burisma?
Cause this is something along the lines of putting a drop of grape juice in a barrel of water and calling it wine. Only person pulling that shit off is Jesus and you ain't him.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244801 Point out where Comer said that
Anonymous
>>1244804 no mention of other documents*
Excuse me.
>>1244803 So the remaining requests have nothing to do with talking to Hunter about his business dealings in Ukraine and it is just 4 emails related to that shit. Glad that shit's settled.
Anonymous
>>1244807 So republicans are trying to pull a fast one by lumping in the 4 emails with 16,000 unrelated emails?
Anonymous
>>1244807 >Nothing to do with Ukraine >It's just 4 emails Holy fuck you can't read can you?
NARA says it's 1600 emails
Anonymous
>>1244804 Lol. Points 2, 3 and 4 are all document requests. We don't know what's in them, but for you to sit here and claim they don't have anything incriminating in them with your psychic powers doesn't surprise me, libshit.
Anonymous
>>1244812 Yeah pretty much.
It's 4 emails lumped in with another 15,994 where Biden is using a pseudonym to communicate with Hunter about burisma or Ukraine
Anonymous
>>1244815 >Biden using a pseudonym means you don't really know who it is Is that where we're going with this? I'm lost.
Anonymous
>>1244816 Its not going anywhere. Comer literally doesn't have anything against Biden.
They have an incredibly weak case implying that Biden may have taken a bribe, but they can't even articulate what the bribe would have been for or how Biden received the bribe.
That makes it a miracle bribe, a virgin birth, which is really holy to Republicunts.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244814 Republicans are the boy who cried benghazi. We have no reason to trust them.
Anonymous
>>1244822 They literally have videos and pictures Hunter took of himself smoking crack and fucking whores, bank accounts him and his dad are sharing, text messages of Hunter complaining to his sister that his dad gets a percentage of his income, and they don't have any evidence? Lol ok.
Not sure what else you could expect. A signed confession?
Anonymous
>>1244831 The crack head stuff is real obviously, but the connection to Joe regarding bribery stuff is dubious at best.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244832 Yeah all these oligarchs were just paying for hunters crack addiction for years because they were nice people
Anonymous
>>1244831 >Not sure what else you could expect literally any indication Joe Biden committed a crime.
You listed none, Comer has shown none, its why no one cares about this monthslong fishing expedition. Put up or shut up.
Anonymous
>>1244832 >but the connection to Joe regarding bribery stuff is dubious at best. Based on what?
Is he secretly a Ukrainian energy savant? I don't believe he speaks Ukrainian.
Is he actually an amazing painter?
Or is he really just a crackhead getting bribes for his dad?
Anonymous
>>1244834 Why is Hunter Biden get millions of dollars in exchange for videos of smoking crack and fucking whores? Is it because he's really a super problem solver?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244834 >Cash from CEFC China went to hunter Biden, James Biden, Hailey Biden, and an unnamed Biden Anonymous
>>1244834 There is literal sworn FBI testimony that the burisma dude paid off both hunter and Joe thru a network of shell companies.
They found hunters payments after subpoenaing bank records for all of hunters businesses.
Why is it unlikely in your mind the second payment exists?
Anonymous
>>1244835 >>1244836 These are all great questions. If you have any evidence of bribery or criminal action whatsoever we'd all love to see it in court. Random internet speculation can only get us so far.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244839 That's what subpoenas and the department of justice is supposed to be for; random citizens can't get records like that.
Anonymous
>>1244839 According to the oligarchs that we're paying hunter, they were paying him in return for his father's support
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244842 maybe this year it will be true
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244838 >There is literal sworn FBI testimony that the burisma dude paid off both hunter and Joe thru a network of shell companies. No, there is an FBI informant report that the informant was told by someone else that a third person claimed to have evidence Biden was paid off.
The informant had no first hand or even second hand knowledge (and came in through fucking Rudy "I love Russian-backed criminals" Giuliani), the alleged middleman was conveniently dead from a traffic accident and couldn't testify to the accuracy of the the tip, and the FBI has never found any paper trail or other evidence that such bribes took place.
Even if the informant had been under oath, they weren't speaking on anything but hearsay. Zero evidence came out of that shit.
Anonymous
>>1244813 >NARA says it's 1600 emails Only 4 of which relate to Hunter/Ukraine/Burisma. Learn to fucking read.
>>1244815 >where Biden is using a pseudonym to communicate with Hunter about burisma or Ukraine Those would have been covered under the request that only produced 4 emails had they existed.
Biden using a pseudonym in emails doesn't mean Biden was talking with Hunter about Burisma via that pseudonym. He demonstrably wasn't.
Anonymous
>>1244835 Consider the following: People can and do trade entirely on their last names. It's legal. Ask Paris Hilton.
Anonymous
>>1244848 Oh. So Burisma hired Hunter Biden for more Twitter clout?
Anonymous
>>1244849 No. Burisma hired Hunter Biden to help legitimize them in the business community in the wake of criminal investigations into the company and to trade on the Biden name.
His name had financial value that increased that of the business. Surely you've heard of something like that before?
As for the painting, same shit. Which is worth more, work by a good artist or work by a famous one?
Anonymous
>>1244853 Uh huh. And Joe firing the prosecutor that was investigating the company his son was getting checks from was just a happy coincidence. Definitely not cashing in on those bribes.
Anonymous
>>1244847 >Only 4 of which relate to Hunter/Ukraine/Burisma. Learn to fucking read. Learn to fucking read.
All 4 groups of emails they requested relate directly to hunter/Ukraine/burisma
Anonymous
>>1244853 MENTAL
E
N
T
A
L
GYMNASTICS
Y
M
N
A
S
T
I
C
S
Anonymous
>>1244854 >And Joe firing the prosecutor that was investigating the company his son was getting checks from was just a happy coincidence 1. Joe was a US VP. He had no power to fire the Ukrainian prosecutor.
2. The US, along with several other international governmental and business organizations wanted the dude fired for corruption.
3. Said corruption included obstructing investigations into Burisma.
4. Ukraine didn't fire him until months after Biden asked (at the behest of the US State Department) by vote of their legislature.
5. He was fired for the fucking aforementioned corruption.
>>1244856 >All 4 groups of emails they requested relate directly to hunter/Ukraine/burisma >Category 2 is only comms using pseudonyms >Category 3 mentions nothing about Burisma or Ukraine and by the names involved relates to Hunter's China deal (that fell through) and NOT Ukraine/Burisma >Category 4 is about a speech and makes zero fucking mention of Hunter Try again you fucking liar.
Anonymous
>>1244858 >He had no power to fire the Ukrainian prosecutor. He bragged that he did.
Anonymous
>>1244858 >Please memory hole the video of Biden bragging about firing the Ukrainian prosecutor investigating his son's bribe payments No chance, lying faggot.
Anonymous
>>1244857 You can think shit looks as suspicious as you fucking want, but the fact is you don't have a fucking shred of evidence anything was crooked.
And you'll never get any such evidence cause Biden's books are clean and the only actions he took in Ukraine in connection to Ukraine was done for the State Department according to multiple State Department officials testifying under oath.
But enjoy your backroom games while you try to make a mountain out of a ditch. Maybe if Comer lies enough times, somebody with a brain will actually start to fucking believe him. Won't ever be a jury, but I digress.
Anonymous
>>1244858 >Joe was a US VP. He had no power to fire the Ukrainian prosecutor. You are so fucking disingenuous you should be kicked in the face.
Literally nobody is alleging that Ukraine gave Joe Biden the personal authority to fire their prosecutors.
You know damn fucking well that Joe Biden bragged about threatening to without a billion dollars from Ukraine until they fired this dude
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244861 Look at the cope+seethe at getting btfo'd.
Anonymous
>>1244859 >He bragged that he did. No. He said the guy was fired after he threatened to withhold aid to Ukraine. Which is true, but the guy was fired months after the threat to withhold the money passed and the money was delivered (as the threat was never followed through on...unlike when Trump illegally withheld aid to get an investigation into Biden).
>>1244860 See above. And choke on a dick.
Anonymous
>>1244862 >You know damn fucking well that Joe Biden bragged about threatening to without a billion dollars from Ukraine until they fired this dude And you know damn well he immediately withdrew the threat, Ukraine got the money, and the dude wasn't fired for months and only after an investigation and vote by the Ukrainian parliament.
But sure, the US State Department, along with multiple other governments and organizations, are all in the tank for fucking Hunter Biden.
And while I'm at it, the investigation was into conduct Burisma engaged in before Hunter was even fucking hired relating to government contracts the owner of Burisma abused his government position to get the company. It never had any fucking thing to do with Hunter.
Anonymous
>>1244868 I gotta say, with all the support I see for Trump from his people, I never see them willing to lie about literally everything like this. It's a whole different level of devotion, almost like your personal livelihood depends on your loyalty. So, glownigger, why are you so rustled?
Anonymous
>>1244868 >And you know damn well he immediately withdrew the threat, No, what the fuck are you talking about? When he told the story he laughed about it and said his threat worked
Anonymous
>>1244868 I agree with this anon:
>>1244869 you really do just lie about everything and pull shit out of your ass at every opportunity, and it really does give the impression your paid to defend this dude or some shit, even the trump supporters don't do what you do.
You really deserve to be ran over by a car
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244869 >I gotta say, with all the support I see for Trump from his people, I never see them willing to lie about literally everything like this. Damn, bruh. It's inspiring that you still manage an online presence despite such severe mental and visual impairment.
>>1244871 >When he told the story Yeah, and? Did you forget this was a public fucking deal and State officials testified about this shit before Congress in open hearings? The threat to withhold the money was within days of it being fucking delivered.
Biden can say whatever he wants to say to make it sound like he was more involved with the decision than he was. The record doesn't fucking back him up. Imagine that, a politician inflating their accomplishments.
Anonymous
>>1244872 >You really deserve to be ran over by a car And you deserve the president you've got cause of how much he makes you seethe.
Enjoy Trump having his life destroyed and being sent to prison next year.
Anonymous
>>1244865 >No. He said the guy was fired after he threatened to withhold aid to Ukraine. Which is true Okay? So you agree with me?
I don't understand what you're getting at.
Anonymous
>>1244874 I don't care what happens to trump you knob gobbling DNC shill
You have two fucking modes; defend Biden or bitch about trump
Get a real fucking job, trump literally mind fucked you
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244784 Because the 1/6 hearings were clearly a farce, as was the entire incident. Anyone with a brain that isn’t damaged by TDS can see that but you libtards are terminal.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244876 >So you agree with me? No. I didn't
>>1244878 Cry moar.
Anonymous
>>1244784 >No. I didn't Then what are you arguing?
He said he threatened Ukraine. I don't understand why you think he's wrong.
Anonymous
>>1244887 I didn't say that's wrong. He did threaten Ukraine as per the State Department's request. You said either he claimed to have fired the guy or have had the power to fire the guy. Neither is true.
He certainly implied his actions led to that, but all he said was A happened, then B happened. But those events were separated by months and by the time he was fired, the threat was long resolved and never acted on.
Money was never withheld from Ukraine by the Obama administration. That would have been illegal (part of why it was so fucked when Trump did it). It was a bluff.
Anonymous
>>1244892 >You said either he claimed to have fired the guy or have had the power to fire the guy. Neither is true. Then why did he brag about blackmailing him?
Are you suggesting it was an empty threat?
Anonymous
>>1244892 Nobody claimed he directly fired the dude or had the power to do so you lying shit bag
You are so typical of a smimy leftist, you know you are in the wrong and so you purposely re-interpret or misrepresent an argument until it makes you *technically* correct
It's like reading a bad snopes article claiming someone "lied when they said 1/3 because the real number is 32%, which is less than 1/3"
Anonymous
>>1244893 >Then why did he brag about blackmailing him? Because he was taking credit for getting a corrupt prosecutor fired?
>Are you suggesting it was an empty threat? Given the money wasn't withheld and the executive branch had no authority to do so, yes. Do you have any evidence it wasn't? We know what illegally withholding money to get Ukraine to take action on a criminal investigation with corrupt purpose looks like. You've got the wrong president.
>>1244894 >Nobody claimed he directly fired the dude What were you fucks trying to suggest by bringing up the bragging otherwise? Or did you just want to extend your embarrassment further?
You were clearly trying to implicate Biden in having a say in the firing. Fact is he fucking didn't and his sole involvement with Ukraine on the matter was relaying a message from the fucking State Department. Eat a dick.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244759 takes a breath:
YOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUU FUUUUUUUUCCCKKKKKKKKKEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRSSSSS WWWWWWWWIIIIIIIIIILLLLLLL DDOOOOOO NNNNNNNNOOOOOTTTHHHHHHIIIINNNNNNGGGGGGG AABBBOOOUTTTTTTTTT11
Anonymous
>>1244895 >Do you have any evidence it wasn't? You mean besides the president's own words..?
Anonymous
>>1244901 People can say anything
Did he write it on paper, in writing, and write down what you are alleging he did? I don't even care if he signed it afterwards, did anyone see him write a confession?
No. Anyone can say anything. Your grasping at straws.
Anonymous
>>1244901 You can't use a threat that didn't come to fruition to prove it wasn't an empty threat. The existence of an empty threat implies a threat in the first place. That'd be even more nonsensical than circular reasoning.
Do you have any evidence the threat that wasn't carried out wasn't empty? Seems like the money should have been withheld until the guy was fired had it not been empty.
Anonymous
>>1244908 >Seems like the money should have been withheld until the guy was fired had it not been empty. That's exactly what happened though.
They didn't get their funding until they fired shokin
Anonymous
>>1244922 >>1244908 >>1244903 >>1244901 This conspiracy was debunked years ago. Biden didn't fire Shokin to save his son. He doesn't even have the authority to do so.
Anonymous
>>1244933 >Biden didn't fire Shokin to save his son. He doesn't even have the authority to do so. You've got to be shitposting by this point, Mr paid shill
Anonymous
>>1244934 Its not even a new debunked conspiracy. Anybody who has read anything about this story outside of far-right cesspits knows what I'm talking about. Shokin was never investigating Burisma. The only evidence he was investigating Burisma is his own statement after being fired. Shokin was fired for being corrupt. The U.S. wanted him gone. The EU wanted him gone. Even Urkaine's own population protested to have him fired. Even if any of this wasn't true, the idea that the vice president of the U.S. has the authority to withhold aid and fire foreign prosecutors, unilaterally, over the head of the president and the state department, is pants on head retarded. Listening to too much Alex Jones melted your brain on this topic. Its actually boring to go over at this point. Its already been covered a thousand time but you schizos can't seem to let it go.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244935 Yeah, yeah. We know the routine now. It's debunked until it's proven to be true then it doesn't matter because it's old news.
Media doesn't report on it, and they move on to the next scam.
Seen it. Tired of it.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244935 >Its not even a new debunked conspiracy Your actually right for once.
It is not new, debunked nor a conspiracy.
He actually threatened Ukraine that aid would be withheld until they fired that dude.
And the factually aid was withheld until they fired that dude.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244770 What was this proof of?
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1244869 >I gotta say, with all the support I see for Trump from his people, I never see them willing to lie about literally everything like this I have *shrugs*
Anonymous
>>1244947 I haven't it's a uniquely Biden supporter sorta thing
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Anonymous
>>1244860 >Please memory hole the video of Biden bragging about firing the Ukrainian prosecutor investigating his son's bribe payments Yeah this was a poor choice for Biden to brag about
https://youtu.be/UXA--dj2-CY Anonymous
>>1244903 Wtf are you talking about? Did he write it down? Piss off. I don’t know why you’re couching his lies and exaggerations so politely. Just say it. He is a serial liar, plagiarist, and bullshitter.
Anonymous
>>1244948 I disagree
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Anonymous
>>1244955 Well, then you'll just have to be wrong then
Anonymous
>>1244954 You can only charge someone with a crime if it's written down, otherwise it's hearsay and means nothing
Anonymous
>>1244958 Unless you're a woman, at which point you can get a """rapist""" put in prison on your word alone.
Anonymous
>>1244954 You can only charge someone with a crime if it's written down, otherwise it's heresy and means nothing
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244960 You can only charge someone with a crime if it's written down, otherwise it's hearsy and means nothing
Anonymous
>>1244959 >>1244954 You can only charge someone with a crime if it's written down, otherwise it's hearsay and means nothing
Anonymous
>>1244952 >this was a poor choice for Biden to brag about Why? Biden was following the US position at the time, and the prosecutor was corrupt and not doing his job properly.
Anonymous
>>1244962 >officer help, there's a murder happening! >woah, sounds like hearsay to me Basically, you're an idiot.
Anonymous
>>1244964 You have to hold up a sign like Wile E. Coyote
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244962 >You can only charge someone with a crime if it's written down You really should feel retarded when you say something this dumb.
Anonymous
>>1244965 No nigger, you went full retard.
Witness testimony is the most commonly used form of evidence on the face of the planet. It has been that way since the dawn of human civilization, even before the concept of criminal justice was formally put into written language.
You're a chimp in human skin.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244969 Chill out homo, it was a joke
Anonymous
>>1244963 Do you sucka da pee pee often?
theone1/2wit dontfullwititsself
Quoted By:
>>1244962 >ou can only charge someone with a crime if it's written down, otherwise it's hearsay and means nothing Are you the same person who posted this?
>>1244123 >if you pick up a gun and shoot someone it doesnt matter how old you are, 1 year old or 100 year old, both get life in prison without parole. simple as Anonymous
this is hysterical
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1245066 Both were good posts.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1244759 This thread makes me so MAD
Hunter is INNOCENT
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1245209 I'm ANGRY about this thread too!
I LOVE the Biden family!
Anonymous
>>1245210 >Shitty b-- -ACK! Anonymous
>>1245209 >>1245239 >>1245249 weird coping mechanism, chud
Anonymous
>>1245253 >weird coping mech-- ACK!! Anonymous
Anonymous
Still waiting for any evidence…
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1245349 That's not a signed and notarized confession backed, conviction in a court of law, proven by a peer reviewed study, and agreed upon by trusted media sources.
And even if it were, that still wouldn't be proof.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1245349 >>1245366 >>1245370 >>1245374 Oh that just be evidence that proves it right? I mean the republicans must be doing a victory dance because they have the evidence now right? This is the thing that will put Biden in jail right?
https://newrepublic.com/post/177539/chuck-grassley-no-evidence-biden-impeachment https://www.vanityfair.com/news/fox-news-hosts-say-republicans-have-no-evidence-to-impeach-joe-biden https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/4198517-senate-gop-says-house-lacks-evidence-for-impeachment/amp/ Oh no they keep admitting that no evidence has been found and they just keep fishing hoping to find something to deflect from Trumps crimes. Because if Biden is a criminal then it doesn’t matter if Trump is a criminal. This is the only strategy the GOP has to defend their criminal head. They know he will be found guilty so they need Biden to be guilty too.
This must suck for your side. So desperate and then y’all claiming evidence when there is provably none found yet.
Keep fishing my dudes.
Anonymous
>>1245384 >This is the thing that will put Biden in jail right? No. Democrats are above the law.
Anonymous
>>1245384 >Vanity fair >New Republic >Autistic schizoposting Shut up retard
Anonymous
>>1245389 >He broke the law by hurting my fragile feelings :'-( Anonymous
>>1245397 >my feewings are proof that Hunter is guilty and Trump is innocent >pwease daddy trump gimmie cummies now >i want to gargle that mushroom sweat daddy Anonymous
>>1245398 You imagine Trump doing the weirdest things.
You people really are fan girls
Anonymous
>>1245400 They had a whole thread where they wrote a bunch of erotic fan fiction about Trump and Ivanka.
I think TDS is evolving into a sexual fetish.
Anonymous
>>1245401 >They I saw that thread. It was one mentally ill and sexually frustrated leftist rotating ips while exposing his trump fetish
Anonymous
>>1245402 Yes "they". There's at least 2 Discord troons manning the fort 24/7 on this board.
Anonymous
>>1245406 Yep, and they don't leave
>>1245400 >>1245401 both are faggots
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1245407 Still glidin' up Biden's anus?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1245398 What a strange response, rightoid.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1245395 When the facts terrify and destroy your reality so you respond with “nuh uh!!!!!!!!”
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I think the DNC troon goon squad is broken
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244822 what’s with all these biblical metaphors lmao
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1244963 >Why? Because now you faggots are left here with a contradictory narrative to argue about.
Half you faggots are sitting here trying to say he didn't fire the prosecutor, the other half of you faggots is trying to say there's nothing wrong with it if he did. It's just incomprehensible unnecessary wild faggotry.
