>>1244928>but Hunters lawyer was literally under the impression that it would protect hunter from all future charges related to the incidentsBut the prosecutor in question wasn't, as they told the judge under questioning.
You surely aren't arguing that because Hunter's lawyers thought the deal was better than it was, the prosecutor offering the deal meant it to be better than it was when him contesting that point is why it fell apart, are you?
>>1244968>he was getting gave him immunity to any and all future chargesRelated to the open investigation, which would be normal for plea deals. Partial pleas are rare as fuck, bordering on unheard of. You know, cause accepting guilt on some charges makes you look less credible going into trial on other charges.
>the prosecutor did not agree, and the deal "fell apart."Which is what I said.
>Look at the cope.I am. You're displaying a ridiculous amount of it.
