https://apnews.com/article/nebraska-summer-ebt-food-program-children-789f2d04bd195086d2e41d0d43b8111c OMAHA, Neb. (AP) — Nebraska’s Republican governor on Friday reiterated his rejection of $18 million in federal funding to help feed children who might otherwise go hungry while school is out.
Nebraska will not participate in the 2024 Summer Electronic Benefits Transfer for Children — or Summer EBT — program, Gov. Jim Pillen said in a written statement. That statement came as advocates for children and low-income families held a news conference outside the Governor’s Mansion in Lincoln to call on Pillen to change his mind before the Jan. 1 deadline to sign up for the program.
The program — part of federal assistance made available during the COVID-19 pandemic — would provide pre-loaded EBT cards to families whose children are eligible for free and reduced-price lunches at school. Those families would receive $40 per eligible child per month over the summer. The cards can be used to buy groceries, similar to how SNAP benefits are used.
“COVID-19 is over, and Nebraska taxpayers expect that pandemic-era government relief programs will end too,” Pillen said in his statement. Pillen announced on Dec. 19 that Nebraska would not participate in the program. He has drawn a firestorm of criticism for later defending that stance at a news conference by saying, “I don’t believe in welfare.”
Neighboring Iowa is also opting out of the program, with Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds announcing that decision last week and saying, “An EBT card does nothing to promote nutrition at a time when childhood obesity has become an epidemic.”
Anonymous
States that participate in the federal program are required to cover half of the administrative costs, which would cost Nebraska an estimated $300,000. Advocates of the program note that the administrative cost is far outweighed by the $18 million benefit, which the U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates would benefit 175,000 Nebraska children who might otherwise go hungry on some days during the summer. Advocacy group Nebraska Appleseed on Friday delivered a petition bearing more than 6,100 signatures from 230 communities across Nebraska calling on the state to utilize the federal Summer EBT program. Many of those who signed the petition also included comments expressing how much the program is needed, especially in light of multi-year inflation that has outpaced many household incomes. “Everything is expensive,” wrote one mother from Bruno, a small rural town in eastern Nebraska. “I’m a single mom who works full time, and my budget is already spread so thin. My son plays sports, and as a growing boy, he could practically eat a hole through the wall; it feels like it never stops. The extra money for food would free up money for things like bills and savings, and car maintenance.” Pillen insisted Friday that the state would continue to help food-insecure children through the Summer Food Service Program, which provides meals and snacks at various sites when school is not in session. Providing on-site services also allows providers to spot and report issues like malnutrition, neglect and abuse in children, he said. But critics say not all families have access to the on-site programs — particularly in Nebraska’s vast rural stretches, where sites can be many miles away from a struggling family. “No kid ever said, ‘I want to be born into a family that struggles,’” said Jenni Benson, president of the Nebraska State Education Association — the state’s largest teachers union. “Why would we even question that people and children deserve food?”
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Preston Love Jr,, a longtime community advocate in Omaha, on Friday questioned whether Pillen was bowing to political pressure in rejecting the federal funding. “I know the governor a little bit, and he seems to be a reasonable man. He’s a man who is compassionate in conversation,” Love said. “This is out of character. So, obviously, he’s not following his heart. He’s following his politics. He’s falling victim to political posturing, and there’s no excuse for that when it comes to children.” As of Friday, 28 other states and six other U.S. territories and Native American tribes had confirmed their participation, according to the USDA.
Anonymous
>>1251475 Why don't Democrats think parents should feed their own children?
Anonymous
>>1251476 >would cost Nebraska an estimated $300,000. Advocates of the program note that the administrative cost is far outweighed by the $18 million benefit, That money belonged to somebody who earned it before you stole it and tried to give it away to somebody else.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251475 Why are republicans so evil?
Anonymous
>>1251475 Actually this is taken out of context
Anonymous
>>1251486 Care to expand on that?
Anonymous
>>1251483 >That money belonged to somebody who earned it When you factor in wage theft, probably not.
Anyway, stealing from people to give food to kids that need it should be a function of government regardless. Kids "earned" their right to food simply by being born and part of "earning" your place in society is making sure government functions like that keep going.
Anonymous
>>1251488 Well now you can take that $600,000 that they were going to waste on "administrative" costs and waste it on something else instead.
Anonymous
>>1251490 >Sorry kids, you need to forfeit your meals over the summer so we can build 3 precision missiles for Israel to bomb muslims. Anonymous
>>1251491 Don't you believe the government should be taking custody of anyone who can't feed their kids?
I believe government is evil and incompetent and not capable of doing really anything correctly. But you already believe government is better able to spend your and my money than we are. Why wouldn't they also be better able to care for children than parents that can't feed them?
Also surely that would be a double win because more Republicans are on welfare than Democrats, so it's a team win when you get the state to confiscate the children of your political rivals, right? Win/win/win, we just need more government.
Anonymous
>>1251487 The context is missing. You have to look at the context, OP is basically posting fake news
Anonymous
>>1251493 >Don't you believe the government should be taking custody of anyone who can't feed their kids? I believe government should make it possible for anyone to feed their kids and take custody of anyone that refuses to.
Do you believe someone that doesn't feed their kids should be left to do so? Either you believe parents should be allowed to starve their children or you believe that poverty should be punished by government.
For someone that claims to hate government you sure do want it to be as powerful or evil as possible.
Anonymous
>>1251494 Feel free to provide the context that justifies letting children starve
Anonymous
>>1251496 >Either you believe parents should be allowed to starve their children or you believe that poverty should be punished by government. I think government is an extremely poor replacement for family or community. I think if there really is a problem it should be handled by those authorities first.
And not only do I not believe either one of those false dichotomy choices you presented, you presumably believe the second option, which is in your words "poverty should be punished by government."
It takes a very sick, deranged mind to really believe something so stupid.
Anonymous
>>1251497 LMAO stupid leftists don't even understand that context is important!
Anonymous
>>1251499 Yeah well provide it then retard
Anonymous
>>1251488 >When you factor in wage theft You misspelled "taxes."
Anonymous
>>1251481 They do, it's why this program exists, looks like Republicans governments aren't pro life after all if they let kids starve to death.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251475 Good, why should I have to pay to take care of Chud Jr?
Anonymous
>>1251475 >“COVID-19 is over, and Nebraska taxpayers expect that pandemic-era government relief programs will end too,” Makes perfect sense.
Anonymous
>>1251498 >I not believe either one of those false dichotomy choices you presented Sure you do. You just said it should be handled by the family or community starving the child and government should not act to feed the child.
As I said, there should never be cause for a child to starve. If it happens, it should be an act of malice that is put an end to, not a failure of means. Rather than government letting kids starve, it should make available the means for children to be fed.
You can't even own the consequences if your own policies.
Anonymous
>>1251475 Democraps try to give away free shit to plunge the country into further debt.
The adults step in and say, "No."
Republicans are le bad.
Same old story.
Anonymous
>>1251513 >You can't even own the consequences if your own policies. You mean like the horrors of what happens in foster care when government takes people's children?
Anonymous
>>1251501 No. I was talking about rich people illegally siphoning off funds they were supposed to pay to their workers.
Wage theft is the most widespread and consequential form of theft there is, accounting for tens of billions in stolen funds annually. Having money that was supposed to go to the poor in the first place siphoned off and given back to them makes perfect sense.
Far more than $300k is stolen in Nebraska. That's a drop in the bucket.
This isn't even "employers don't pay their fair share" commie bullshit. This is just plain old fraud and violations of contract law.
Anonymous
>>1251515 You should tell that directly to the children, they'll understand.
Anonymous
>>1251500 lol, idiot, you have to pay attention to the context!
Anonymous
>>1251516 >You mean like the horrors of what happens in foster care when government takes people's children? You seem to be ignoring the horrors that instigating the taking in the first place. We were talking about starving children here and beyond that most kids end up in foster care in the first place *because they were being abused physically or sexually*.
But you're right, the foster care system should have *more* government oversight. People often can't be trusted with their kids.
I don't know how you could possibly bitch about too much government involvement in raising kids and then bring up the foster care system as if all the kids there were even taken in the first place or the government is the one inflicting the horrors.
Anonymous
>>1251527 >But you're right, the foster care system should have *more* government oversight. People often can't be trusted with their kids. You mean government employees can't be trusted to care for other people's kids; a completely foreseeable outcome.
And obviously more government isn't the cure for a problem created by government.
Anonymous
>>1251528 Oh. So you literally do not know how foster care works.
That explains a lot, lmao.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251518 Oh, so you were talking about some made up liberal bullshit instead of the government taking money from everybody which actually happens every single day. Thanks for the clarification.
Anonymous
>>1251529 >People being paid by the government to watch other people's children aren't government employees Go ahead with your hair splitting bullshit so we can all laugh.
Anonymous
How come everything on this board is about america literally no one cares guys
Anonymous
>>1251532 >Anyone receiving government benefits is a government employee In that case the private sector doesn't exist.
Anonymous
>>1251538 >american image board >american website >90% of all threads started by leftist canadians being paid by american democrats Gee I wonder
Anonymous
>>1251544 Obviously I'm not talking about private adoption or whatever, but are you really trying to say state funded foster parents aren't government employees?
Do they have other jobs? Is the government typically the sole source of their income? Does the government screen these people in some way? (For employment)
Is taking care of children not actually a job in your eyes, and that's the problem?
Anonymous
>>1251547 >Do they have other jobs? yes
>Is the government typically the sole source of their income? no, and the government gives them about as much as it takes for them to take care of the kid. So foster parents aren't actually making a net income from the government.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251546 >90% of all threads started by leftist canadians being paid by american democrats Interesting projection, are you still bitter that the fascist right wing American funded trucker riots got squashed by trudeau?
Anonymous
>>1251547 Like I said, you have literally no fucking idea how the foster system works, lmao.
Ronald the republican tells you
Quoted By:
>>1251475 Gubmint aint to feed the kids
gubmint is there to gives me a road to drive my pickup on, and to give me pipes for my water and toilet.
The church is there to give those too lazy to work some food
Anonymous
>>1251551 >no, and the government gives them about as much as it takes for them to take care of the kid. So foster parents aren't actually making a net income from the government. >>1251557 Lol, lying faggots.
Group homes are run by social workers and foster homes funded by the government typically don't have another income. I'm sorry you faggots just can't stand facing the consequences of the policies you support.
Anonymous
>>1251557 In my state they're paying ~800$ per child per month which is approximately double the minimum child support requirement. Women are already living off government assistance with children for half the amount they're offering for foster care and you're trying to say that isnt a full time job?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251565 Yes, $27 per day is not a full time job. Doubly so when you get no breaks, even on weekends, and all your expenses for the job come out of that $27.
Anonymous
>>1251475 why should people be robbed at gun point, just because lazy fucks are too lazy to get a job to feed their kids?
Anonymous
>>1251576 >to get a job to feed their kids? Because the people getting robbed at gunpoint aren't paying their employees enough to feed their kids.
Anonymous
>>1251561 >and foster homes funded by the government typically don't have another income. lol what? Have you literally never met anybody in foster care? Foster homes are normal families that have normal jobs, and then they get a small stipend for the foster child.
>>1251565 >$800 LMAO you're an actual, literal child who hasn't entered the real world yet. $800/month is not actually a lot of money, even if it is more than your mommy and daddy give you for allowance. And $800 is more than most states IME, it varies by age but something around $500 is probably more common. Which is about what it takes to feed and clothe and care for a child, not to mention having a spare bedroom.
But tell you what, since you think this is some kind of get rich quick scheme why don't you do it?
Anonymous
>>1251525 But the article did post the context. Graduate from high school before posting
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251581 Yes, and that context changes things, duh. Why do leftists always have to ignore the context?
Anonymous
>>1251524 No one is starving in the US. You're just being a bitch.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251623 Then you should be fine paying your taxes. Don't be a bitch.
Anonymous
>>1251486 Fuck no its not. Conservatives don't give a shit about anyone once their out of the womb and can be exploited, that's a fact full stop.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251623 Oh to be so ignorant. It must be blissful.
Anonymous
>>1251578 get a better job and stop wasting 90% of your income on drugs
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251633 >get a better job Be a better employer and citizen and stop acting entitled to labor as if the cost for it isn't going to either come from you directly or come from you through your taxes.
That really is the long and the short of it. If employers were less shit, we could do with less government to pick up the slack.
You want to pay less taxes, vote in people that will promote higher wages instead of cheaper labor. Vote for that party and quit bitching.
Anonymous
>>1251629 lol why don't leftists understand that context matters?
Anonymous
>>1251671 you have an uncanny penchant for mirroring your opponent without understanding how the actual argument is supposed to work
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251672 It's just some rightoid intentionally acting retarded, as opposed to unintentionally acting retarded like they normally do.
Anonymous
>>1251580 >But tell you what, since you think this is some kind of get rich quick scheme why don't you do it? Because I have a real job, but plenty of shitlibs like you have nothing better to do, so 800/months per child is a huge windfall for somebody who has no ambition in life, especially if you can manage to stack 4 or 6 of them into a house.
And yeah, I consider somebody getting 800/month for sitting on their ass a full time government employee.
Anonymous
>>1251717 If every person with a "fake" job (according to you) disappeared, America would collapse.
Anonymous
>>1251730 >If the government stopped printing endless money for people who don't actually produce anything or work, America would collapse Or it would actually survive.
Anonymous
>>1251629 “Full stop” is code for “I’m an unlikable cunt”
Anonymous
>>1251717 >sitting on their ass What happened to being a foster parent being a full time job?
Also, $7.2k per person year isn't much. It's not like the kids cost nothing to support (that's what the money's fucking for in the first damn place).
Anonymous
>>1251735 Actually it's code for period. You know that thing people you've never touched have.
Anonymous
>>1251734 >just let the kids starve lol Anonymous
>>1251739 >What happened to being a foster parent being a full time job? Every foster home I'm aware of has more than one kid placed in the home. Typically they max out as many as they can. When you're living in an area where rent is only 400$/month average, getting 800/month per kid leaves a lot of room for profit.
And to be 100% clear, the people babysitting kids for the government in temporary housing are doing it for the money, which absolutely attracts the worst type of people.
Anonymous
>>1251734 >actually produce anything If you really "actually produce anything" then you're breaking your body for wages that won't even cover their medical bills later in their short life, and I have to say you deserve it. But I doubt you do. You sound like middle management. Too dumb or unlikable to make real money but too bitter towards the poor to actually put in real work.
>>1251745 >When you're living in an area where rent is only 400$/month average The median national rent is $1,702/month and the median rental unit sure as shit can't support "as many kids as possible" and that's before factoring in other expenses like food, clothes, schooling, medical care, etc.
God, you're an out of touch piece of excrement.
Anonymous
>>1251748 >You sound like middle management. I own my own business. Way too much of the market is fake bullshit and government direct employees or contractors. Most of the financial market is fake; but that's not necessarily the governments fault.
30-40% of GDP being government spending is unsustainable for the 60-70%.
>The median national rent is $1,702/month And the compensation for foster homes in those places is more, stupid faggot. But the numbers I cited go together.
Anonymous
>>1251717 >sticking 4 or 6 of them into a house yeah, you really have no idea what foster care is. I have never heard of any foster family having multiple kids unless they are siblings.
Anonymous
>>1251749 >I own my own business Oh. So you don't actually produce anything, lmao.
Pay your workers, pay your taxes, then fuck off and die.
Anonymous
>>1251740 You have to be 18 to post here
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251755 He's the lone employee, and he sells weight loss shakes
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251760 Weak comeback, you got owned by anon.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251749 Mean pay for a child in foster care is $8,042 per child per year, you fucking cuck.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251475 Bit clickbaity title there OP don't you think?
Nowhere does it say the children will starve. The parents of those children will now have to use their own money to feed their kids instead of someone else's.
Anonymous
On unrelated note, is this the most reddit board on 4chan? I've been browsing here for a few minutes and I think it very well might be.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251511 Stop making sense, we want to be mad at RepubliKKKans okay?
Anonymous
>>1251780 Agreed. Plenty of R3ddit tranny mods visit here during their dilate hour.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251780 Do you have multiple personalities shill anon?
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1251784 I assume they're dreaming of conservative cocks while they dilate.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1251780 Yes. On both the left and the right. The leftists here are not like the leftists on other boards. They genuinely don't know how 4chan works and are confused by this site and its culture. Idk if they came from reddit but they definitely don't belong on 4chan, and not just because they're leftists because other boards have leftists who actually fit in. Some of the conservatives here are also redditors, the anon who started the not-pasting-articles trend is a redditor and I suspect other conservative anons who don't paste articles are also redditors.
Anonymous
>>1251780 >>1251784 >>1251787 >>1251806 >>1251822 Is there a reason the election tourists are trying to change the topic from republicans spitefully letting children starve?
Or is it because they got BTFO, again.
Anonymous
>>1251829 see
>>1251486 It was taken out of context desu senpai, the context completely changes the meaning. I don't need to elaborate, because merely pointing out that context matters wins the argument. Checkmate, leftists!
Anonymous
>>1251839 you're so mad lol, from yesterday still?
Anonymous
>>1251841 mad? Not at all. I'm glad you showed me the strategy of
>claim the quote is missing context that changes the meaning >refuse to explain how the context changes the meaning >declare victory I will be using your strategy more in the future
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251844 that's your retarded interpretation of the "strategy" but have fun playing catch up
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251829 Oh for fucks sake you and your strawmanning fucking knock it off already, libshit
Anonymous
>>1251839 How is it out of context?
Anonymous
>>1251743 Yes, let immigrant kids starve.
Our native kids are more important than some third world brownoid anchor baby.
Anonymous
>>1251921 Anchor babies are citizens. They are entitled to everything that the children of native citizens are.
Anonymous
>>1251923 Nah, sorry nigga, they ain't, they just ain't.
And I'm not going to play by your retarded rules either.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251910 It's some faggot rightwinger shitposting
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251921 They're hurting white children in the process too, you racist dumbass
Anonymous
>>1251925 So, you reject the 14th amendment? Why do you hate the constitution?
Anonymous
>>1251829 They also want to take their teddy bears and kill their puppies. Wake up sheeple!
Anonymous
>>1251931 >So, you reject the 14th amendment? Yes.
Anonymous
>>1251936 Why do you hate the constitution?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251938 it was written by straight white men
Anonymous
>>1251483 If helping children seems so disgusting to you, I hope you understand how utterly unfuckable you are, Dude. Please don't bother women.
Anonymous
>>1251949 I'm married with 3 kids. If you want to help kids so bad, why don't you get a fucking job and do it yourself?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251475 i love how the protesters always have time to stand around government buildings and complain, but never have work to do. im too busy working to go down and protest. where the fuck are they finding the time to do this, work, and take care of their kids?
they dont. thats the simple answer. they dont work, have the government take care of their kid, and do dumb shit like this. now i have to pay for their kid and mine. its bullshit
Anonymous
>>1251475 >sensationalist title >trannime.jpeg >apjews >waaaah da babies need more gibs Yawn. Another leftard shitrag for the
>>>/trash/ Anonymous
>>1251950 Damn, you found the one retard that'd let you flop around on top of her and procreate.
Anonymous
>>1252181 he found your mom?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251950 how sad is it that you have to lie about having a family like that
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1252182 If he likes sticking his dick in ash, fucking go for it.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251935 Honestly, Republicans would do that.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1252005 Anime image board
Seethe more /pol/
Anonymous
>>1251950 Brother, if you have children I'm worried about them. Do you make them feel like their lives are a gift you gave them? Children get to eat, it doesn't matter who their parents are.
Anonymous
>>1252285 Gift implies he doesn't expect them to pay him back.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1252287 I'm fascinated by this comment. Would you please elaborate?
Anonymous
>>1252005 How do I filter threads like these? They're ruining my /news/ experience.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1252308 You go back to /pol/ and never return to this board
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251483 >taxes are theft when they go to feeding children but not when they go to other dumb shit republicans love Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251753 >I have never heard of any foster family having multiple kids unless they are siblings But I saw a meme on /pol/!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251488 >>1251496 >>1252285 No child goes hungry in America unless their parent is a neglectful and refuses to feed them. Would you be in favor of arresting the parents of any child who needs a """"free""""" lunch?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1251507 >have kid >don’t feed kid >kid dead >the governments fault You’re a fucking retard