They should opt of funds for Immigration given they're all in favor of human trafficking too
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/12/us/school-lunches-assistance-republicans.html Fifteen Republican-led states have declined to participate in a new federal program from the Biden administration aimed at combating food insecurity among low-income families.
Under the Summer Electronic Benefit Transfer program, set to launch this year, states will provide $120 per eligible child to families in the U.S. to help cover food costs through the summer months, when many children are out of school. The Summer EBT program was approved by Congress in 2022 and aims to improve food and nutrition security, access and affordability.
The Department of Agriculture announced on Wednesday that 35 states, all five U.S. territories and four tribes had opted to join the program. But 15 states led by Republican governors have rejected it, The New York Times reported, meaning millions of children are set to lose out on benefits.
The states that decided not to participate are Alabama, Alaska, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont and Wyoming.
Summer EBT is expected to provide nearly $2.5 billion in grocery benefits to as many as 21 million children across the 35 states that signed up.
“No kid should have to spend their summer hungry, or without nutritious food,” Deputy Agriculture Secretary Xochitl Torres Small said in a statement. “Summer EBT is a giant step forward in meeting the needs of our nation’s children and families throughout the year, and especially in the summer months.”
Republican governors of the states that opted out of the program had varying concerns, some citing the administrative costs and nutritional standards.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
“In the end, I fundamentally believe that we solve the problem, and I don’t believe in welfare,” Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen told the Lincoln Journal Star, defending his decision not to accept the $40-a-month Summer EBT. The state will still use a different food program that will be the “best route to ensure that Nebraska’s low-income children don’t go hungry this summer.” Crystal FitzSimons, director of school programs at the Food Research & Action Center, told CNN that providing families with grocery benefits to purchase additional food is “one of the easiest ways to support kids having access to food.” Governors of states that enrolled in the program have expressed strong support. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, a Democrat, described the program as “a critical lifeline for families struggling to make ends meet,” and Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, a Republican, said Summer EBT was “an important new tool to give Arkansas children the food and nutrition they need.” Some of the states that chose to participate, such as California and Massachusetts, have also recently adopted permanent programs granting free meals to public school students as part of growing efforts to address food insecurity. Children who qualify for such free meals in schools are also eligible to receive food aid through the Summer EBT program, CNN reported. More families experienced food insecurity in 2023 after pandemic-era food aid expired, CBS News reported. A report from the Department of Agriculture found that in 2022, about 17 million U.S. households experienced food insecurity, compared with 13.5 million in 2021, when there was more food assistance available through COVID-19 aid programs.
Anonymous
Republicans are against abortion unless the child has been born.
Anonymous
>>1256324 more government spending will surely fix the economy this time
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1256327 "when you find yourself in a hole, keep digging" - democrats
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256327 >Children should only be fed if someone that "actually matters" can get rich off it Anonymous
>>1256332 Yea children are starving in Republican states but look at our books!!!!!!
Anonymous
>>1256326 To add to that, I'm also against all parents from, and especially children born in an environment surrounded by Democrat degeneracy. Weakness and failure of any kind is completely revolting; and an environment that mass manufactures these things in people as if we're in a factory disgusts me even more.
Anonymous
>>1256337 >FEED ME MOMMY GOVERNMENT Liberals are edging for bread lines
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256338 >Weakness and failure of any kind is completely revolting; and an environment that mass manufactures these things in people as if we're in a factory disgusts me even more. So what you're saying is Reconstruction shouldn't have ended?
Anonymous
>republicans vote to feed their own children with their own earnings >democrats are enraged by this
Anonymous
>>1256343 >republicans vote to feed their own children with their own earnings If Republicans were feeding their own children, the 10 states with the worst food insecurity rates wouldn't be:
>Missouri >Arkansas >Louisiana >Wisconsin >Oklahoma >Texas >Alabama >South Carolina >Kentucky >Mississippi Spot the fucking pattern.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Republicans need to starve kids so their brains get enough shitty development to maybe vote R down the road now that lead isn't everywhere anymore.
Anonymous
>>1256344 >Spot the fucking pattern. States with large urban centers full of blacks, run by democrats
Anonymous
>>1256344 meanwhile the top 10 counties with food insecurity rates are democrat. it's mainly democrats incapable of feeding themselves and their children.
Anonymous
>>1256344 What the fuck is a "food insecurity rate"?
Because I'm in Louisiana and there isn't a skinny person in this entire fucking state. Everyone here eats enough to feed 15 african children.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256344 9 far right states, and 1 purple state where the elections are corruptly rigged for Republicans.
Interesting.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256349 >Spot the fucking pattern The pattern is a bullshit metric used by libtards to deflect from problems they themselves cause, or cannot fix. Or as a way to shame red states for issues they themselves also suffer from, but need it to be measured differently so as to shift the blame onto Republicans. If there's even really a problem at all. Or if the problem is not due to political parties but the people instead, see; 'Food Deserts.'
Anonymous
>>1256358 >USDA's food security statistics are based on a national food security survey conducted as an annual supplement to the monthly Current Population Survey (CPS). The CPS is a nationally representative survey conducted by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census for the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The CPS provides data for the Nation's monthly unemployment statistics, and annual income and poverty statistics. >In December of each year, after completing the labor force interview, about 40,000 households respond to the food security questions—and to questions about food spending and about the use of Federal and community food assistance programs. The households interviewed in the CPS are selected to be representative of all civilian households at State and national levels.security would typically experience. CPS sends out 60,000 surveys every year to random households to produce this information.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Don't fucking care, still voting TRUMP even if he ran over my dog and ran over my grandma.
Starvin' Marvin' wants a bite of your burger
Starvin' Marvin' wants a bite of your burger Sat 13 Jan 2024 17:48:15 No. 1256379 Report Quoted By:
It's like me and Africa. I don't see the starving kids in front of me, so I can ignore them.( I don't watch tv, so I don't see the walking skeleton kids). Republicans think the same way about US kids, as long as they starve out of sight.
Anonymous
>>1256349 All I see is you being racist.
Anonymous
>>1256362 And what does it use to quantify this data? What questions does it ask? Because I'm calling shenanigans.
Anonymous
>>1256399 Maybe if you hug them extra hard they'll act like people!
Anonymous
>>1256407 >The food security survey asked one adult respondent in each household a series of questions about experiences and behaviors of household members that indicate food insecurity, such as being unable to afford balanced meals, cutting the size of meals because of too little money for food, or being hungry because of too little money for food. The food security status of the household is assigned based on the number of food-insecure conditions reported. >Households with very low food security among children are identified by responses to a subset of questions about the conditions and experiences of children. Survey respondents also report the amounts their households spend on food and whether they use public or private food and nutrition assistance programs. All households with incomes below 185 percent of the Federal poverty threshold are asked questions about the use of Federal and community-based food and nutrition assistance programs. >In order to minimize the burden on respondents, households with incomes above that range are not asked the questions unless they indicate some level of difficulty in meeting their food needs on the first of the preliminary screener questions. Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256410 You gotta be hard on people like that.
I suggest castrating him and feminizing him by putting him in women's clothing and injecting him with meds.
Nothing could be more humiliating.
Anonymous
>>1256324 >Feds:Do what we want or else no money for your schools!! No
>The Republicans are starving the kids!! Fake and gay
>>1256324 Anonymous
>>1256350 >meanwhile the top 10 counties with food insecurity rates are democrat Google law preemption
Anonymous
>>1256453 Stop bussing your homeless people to blue states and that wouldn't happen
Anonymous
>>1256324 >food insecurity among low-income families kek
https://i.imgur.com/SmqIjPp.jpg >“No kid should have to spend their summer hungry, or without nutritious food, I agree. So why aren't their parents feeding them? We should arrest the parents and take the kids away.
>inb4 BUT THE PARENTS CAN'T AFFORD FOOD! 99% of the parents on this could easily afford food if they didn't waste money on cigarettes, drugs, and Apple watches. This isn't about whether the government should subsidize food, it's about whether the government should subsidize other frivolous spending. The other 1% are such hopeless losers that they shouldn't have custody of their children to begin with.
Anonymous
>>1256454 Lieberal headcanon is wild asf.
Anonymous
>>1256413 LMAO this is literally just based on feelz. Shitty parents with shitty spending habits and even shittier diets say they feel like they need more gibs to buy Twinkies, and naive Zoomers like OP believe it because they "trust the experts"
Anonymous
>>1256455 While it is harder to afford food thanks to Bidenflation, no one in the US is starving.
In fact, poor people are almost always morbidly obese in the US.
It's really weird.
His single mother won't let little Jabba-Darius die of hunger. He'll die of a broken heart. And I mean heart disease from being a fat fuck.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1256463 >>1256460 Did you arrive at that opinion after watching 500 hours of Fox News or are you going by your feelings again?
Anonymous
>>1256455 >Kids should starve for the moral failings of their parents Also why do people tend to be more evil in red states?
Anonymous
>>1256358 It's a rebranding of "food deserts" since everyone already figured out that simply because blacks steal everything in black neighborhoods so no sane person would operate a grocery store there.
Additionally it's combined with "feelings of hunger" without taking into account how many trillions of McCalories morbidly obese children ingest in a day.
Essentially it's newspeak. Ignore it.
Anonymous
>>1256469 How did you get to be this racist and when was the last time you went outside?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256471 Interesting story. I live in a 60% black city.
I see little Fatisha's and Obesquarious' all fucking day.
But if you're really looking to become more racist, I know a guy. Email me.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256471 My girlfriend cheated on me with a black guy and now I make racist shitposts on a slow 4chan board to compensate
Anonymous
>>1256467 are you saying that this anon
>>1256413 was quoting 500 Fox News? Your comment didn't make any sense at all. We aren't even 40 replies into the thread yet, are the leftists here really becoming mind-broken more easily now? Usually it took 100 replies before you started spouting incoherent bullshit.
>>1256468 No. CPS should take the children and the parents should go to jail. Make an example out of a few of these shitbags and the other parents will get the hint and start feeding their kids.
Anonymous
>>1256476 are the "leftists" in the room now?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256477 >lol, leftists don't exist XD the problem with Zoomers is that you don't even understand the memes you spout. You just force them into threads where the context doesn't make sense because your generation never learned how memes actually work.
Anonymous
>>1256476 Alright so what's your plan for all the kids you're removing from their households?
Going to actually do something about them or just wait for someone to adopt them?
Anonymous
>>1256476 >CPS should take the children and the parents should go to jail >Instead of feeding kids, the government should be feeding, housing, and raising kids and also feeding and housing parents Anonymous
>>1256494 Also, just pointing out this started with Republicans saying they vote to feed their own kids because they're buttmad over tax money going to feed other people's kids.
So their solution would cost several times more and still result in tax money going to feed other people's kids.
Really they just want to kill the poor.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256497 I wish they would just come out and say it instead of beating around the bush
Anonymous
>>1256497 But no kids in the US are starving.
It's likely there hasn't been a death by starvation in the US in 20 years.
Therefore there's no need for CPS so the solution costs exactly $0 and a Republican vote.
Anonymous
>>1256497 >someone suggests you get a job and feed your own children >"AAAAA THEYRE TRYING TO KILL ME HELP ME BIDENMAN" Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256504 They even have the option of visiting a Christian food bank.
However, those make libershits seethe uncontrollably because they aren't funded by theft from workers.
Anonymous
>>1256500 >But no kids in the US are starving. This is your brain on lead.
Anonymous
>>1256511 Oh? How many starved to death last year?
Anonymous
>>1256515 Google it retard, the point is the number isn;t zero like you thought. Also NTA so don't bother trying to gaslight.
Anonymous
>>1256519 >We know that 20-30 people die from starvation thanks to CDC death records. Whoa. Big problem.
Anonymous
>>1256523 not enough dead kids for you?
Anonymous
>>1256524 How many were kids? I can't find that on google since the most popular result there is a lie about 13,000 people starving every year.
I'll let you know if it's enough or not.
Anonymous
>>1256526 >I'll let you know if it's enough or not. or we can ignore psychopaths like you, as we normally do
Anonymous
>>1256528 Sounds like you're ready to raise taxes, funnel money directly to billionaires and corporations yet again for a very minor problem.
How many billions will it take to feed these 20-30 people this time Mafiacrat?
Anonymous
>>1256531 projecting just makes you look dishonest
Anonymous
>>1256523 Honestly much more people die every year from the homelessness caused by democrat leadership
Anonymous
>>1256534 >lets let children starve because homelessness you aren't even trying to make sense anymore are you
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256536 The thing that irks me most about the conservative ideology is the spinelessness. Regardless of whether or not I agree with them I can always appreciate someone who just owns it and says "Yeah, you know what, I just don't think certain people deserve to live. The government should let undesirables die."At least they're being honest instead of hiding behind this "Oh but muh billionaires blah bluh democrat city homelessness hurp derp" bullshit. Just say you don't give a shit about poor people or their kids and you have no desire to help them. I have no clue why being honest about their beliefs is so difficult.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256532 >Uses mafioso style shakedown tactics on the populace >Accuses others of projecting You didn't actually vote for Joe Biden, did you?
You probably did. Ahahahaha!
Anonymous
>>1256536 The thing that irks me most about the conservative ideology is the spinelessness. Regardless of whether or not I agree with them I can always appreciate someone who just owns it and says "Yeah, you know what, I just don't think poors deserve to live. I don't care about their suffering. The government should let undesirables die." At least they're being honest instead of hiding behind this "Oh but muh billionaires blah bluh democrat city homelessness hurp derp" bullshit. Just say you don't give a shit about poor people or their kids and you have no desire to help them. I have no clue why being honest about their beliefs is so difficult.
Anonymous
>>1256541 Wow, that's a nice strawman.
Anonymous
>>1256543 that was actually an observation
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256544 how long have you been observing these figments of your imagination?
Anonymous
>>1256490 Foster care. You don't have to remove that many. Just make an example of a few parents by sending them to jail, and the other parents will get the hint and start feeding their kids
>>1256494 >>1256497 >be Zoomer leftist >go to woke public schools that teach kids to hate white men instead of learning basic math kek.
CPS would only take a few kids, and prosecute the parents for child abuse. All of the other parents would then start feeding their children.
>Democrats: We should give free money to abusive parents who refuse to feed their kids even though the parents can afford it! >Republicans: We should punish abusive parents who refuse to feed their kids gee I wonder which is the better and cheaper long-term solution here
Anonymous
>>1256477 >Leftists don't exist in my mind when it isn't convenient for me to admit it; but otherwise, when I'm shitposting endlessly in my asylum about Republicans le bad, they do exist. Anonymous
>>1256546 So, to review, you invented this "poor parents are purposefully starving their kids" narrative in your head then on the spot built the retarded solution of creating a giant foster care state to address this problem that you just invented. I mean, points for creativity, that's for sure.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1256555 20-30 a year at most.
I'm sure CPS takes more kids to NYC's jewish rape tunnels every year.
Anonymous
just being real here. the only people upset about this are democrats. democrats tend to be low earners and depend more on government resources to get by.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
idk i might take a hiatus from posting here, the right wing shills do a good enough job of making themselves look like absolute shit
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256559 meanwhile republicans, who tend to skew high earners, are tired of subsidizing the lifestyles of people that hate them and hate this country. them's the brakes
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256558 so you want to give 20-30 parents special treatment because they do a bad job, and you think this is a good idea,
typical zoomzoom democuck
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256465 Well you always talk about how passionate you are about the plight of the poor and downtrodden. You say how compassionate you are, but then when we send you hobos and wetbacks you start to cry about it. Well??? Which is it!? Are you charitable or are you not!? Put your money where your cocksucker is, and prove it!!
Anonymous
>>1256471 When was the last time you lived in a poor, majority black neighborhood? When was the last time you were ever outside of your enclave?
Anonymous
>>1256576 >Implying that basement dwelling /pol/tards got that way from living in ghettos Anonymous
>>1256578 I'm not talking to them, I'm talking to the self-righteous saviors of mankind and all reality; the Liberal/Democrat/Leftist.
Anonymous
>>1256588 >I'm talking to the self-righteous saviors of mankind and all reality; the Liberal/Democrat/Leftist. Someone has to save conservatives from themselves, anon
Anonymous
>>1256589 What do you believe will actually happen to them if you do not intervene?
Anonymous
>>1256592 West Virginia, Alaska, and Louisiana.
Anonymous
>>1256592 The thing that's already happening now - rural southern states have the highest drug deaths per capita, highest welfare rates and the worst education outcomes in the entire nation. Their political parties convinced them that they were going to bring the old dog food factory back and that illegal immigrants were going to turn their kid trans and look at them now - wasting away in dead/dying small towns, living off of welfare, voting down every infrastructure bill that might give them jobs because the GOP told them that anything other than working until you die in a coal mine is communism. Conservatives are constantly the dumb, petulant children we have to drag kicking and screaming into the future. This is and will continue to be the case until we can invent some sort of gene editing that can fix whatever emotional/cognitive deficiency that creates conservatism.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256446 >Do what we want! (aka feed the children in your state) Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256608 >rural southern states Yeah I know you people love focusing on the states with the highest black population and calling them out as the worst states in the union, but what's really funny about your argument is even when examining those states, the parts with the most issues are blue counties
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fb/2020_United_States_presidential_election_results_map_by_county.svg/700px-2020_United_States_presidential_election_results_map_by_county.svg.png Anonymous
>>1256324 how is this bad? why should I pay for some faggot's kids because that faggot is too lazy to get a job? anyone who doesn't feed their kids should be flogged at town hall every day until they feed their kids
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256608 >rural southern states have the highest drug deaths per capita, highest welfare rates and the worst education outcomes in the entire nation. Hello racist. I see the Democrat position hasn't changed at all.
Anonymous
>>1256608 >rural southern states have the highest drug deaths per capita, highest welfare rates those are literally the black belt states. like those issues you are talking about are literally just states with large black populations
>and the worst education outcomes in the entire nation not really, most are on par with or better than california
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/rankings/education/prek-12 Anonymous
>>1256615 >ME ME ME Jesus cries at your behavior.
Anonymous
>>1256623 >Being racist to excuse Republican governorship. Anonymous
>>1256625 you are the one saying blacks are retarded and on drugs and welfare
Anonymous
>>1256624 if I am being forced to pay taxes, then I have a say in what they are and how they are used. don't steal my labor and then bitch when I am against what you are stealing my labor for
Anonymous
>>1256399 I like how you called him racist but you didn't call him wrong.
Anonymous
>>1256626 >N-N-N-NO U Except you're the one being racist.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256628 He didn't call the post before wrong.
Anonymous
>>1256627 So you're fine being treated like a slave by corporations, but the moment the common good is asked of you, you cry.
Anonymous
>>1256640 Donate to your local church, Good Samaratan.
Anonymous
>>1256644 >Donate to the local con man and cult Fixed
Anonymous
>>1256645 No I said "church", not "the government".
You just don't care about poor people. What a piece of shit you are.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256646 So you want a theocracy. That's even worse.
Anonymous
>>1256339 >Liberals are edging for bread lines I'm fully convinced both sides of the party are damn near full commie/socialist of different shades, and garner sexual pleasure from making us miserable.
>>1256344 >Spot the fucking pattern I see it. Ten states that aren't massively subsidized and don't take more than they produce, economically speaking. Places like California and New York aren't net positive producers for the country.
>>1256324 >aimed at combating food insecurity among low-income families. I wonder what else was lumped into that fucking pork bill that made the socialist opt out. Probably Ukraine or pissrael money.
Anonymous
>>1256649 >Ten states that aren't massively subsidized and don't take more than they produce, economically speaking Except red states are also overwhelmingly more dependent on federal tax dollars than blue states too.
Hell, Louisiana, Alabama, and Mississippi are in the top 10 on that list too.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256651 >Except red states are also overwhelmingly more dependent on federal tax dollars than blue states too. >HI! I'M DOING A RACISM Die, CHUD.
Anonymous
>>1256640 >voluntary employment with compensation and where you just go home at the end of the day is the same as slavery! We need to raise the voting age to 25
Anonymous
>>1256640 how am I being treated like a slave by corporations? I don't work for a corporation. and fuck the "common good". spend your own money, faggot
Anonymous
>>1256629 I'm being racist by pointing out the states you are bitching about have the highest rate of black in the US?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256603 Those places aren't so bad.
>>1256676 Yes because black people are NEVER responsible for their own behavior. Like children, they just don't know any better!
Anonymous
>>1256651 If Louisiana left the union you'd lose access to the Mississippi River delta, the Port of New Orleans, and Port 4chan. That would be the largest port in all of the Americas and 14% of your fuel instantly gone.
If we lost California we'd never have another Democrat POTUS.
Gee... hard to see which one is the bigger detriment to the nation, I dunno...
Anonymous
Idk what the foundation of this argument is, but im guessing it's someone stating that a couple southern states with the highest population of black people in the US are shitty states with high incidence of adverse outcomes. I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess someone stated that was because they are conservative states. Other "conservative" states aren't like that. Utah. The Dakotas. Nebraska. Idk, is Idaho red? The point is all the states are super rural and are conservative and don't have this issue of negative outcomes. As everyone in the US knows, where black people live statistically are worse areas with worse outcomrs and high rates of drug use and crime. Maybe you want to attribute this to institutional racism, maybe you want to attribute it to black people. idk. But the common thread here isn't if the state is red or blue. It's the states demographics
Anonymous
>>1256691 America would also lose it's last aluminum refinery.
t. Visited nolo around October and did a bunch of touristy stuff. I love that city. So fun to visit.
Anonymous
>>1256693 You'd maybe have a point if those southern states didn't have white people controlling the government.
Racist leaders deliberately screwing over a portion of their population is the problem. Racists will call this a 'demographics' problem because they're wanting to get rid of a particular demographic.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256694 How long until the Democrats shut it down for "Climate Change"?
Anonymous
>>1256696 >if any black person anywhere ever fails to achieve greatness it's because a white somewhere made them fail Huh. This Zero Accountability shtick that you Democrats are on sure is scary. I think it might lead to bad outcomes for governance and society.
Anonymous
>>1256700 >i like to suck dicks and create strawmen >please fill my ass with tranny testicles weird comeback, but you do you buddy
Or if you want to have an actual conversation, stop setting up your own strawmen to knock down, faggot
Anonymous
>>1256704 >Racist leaders deliberately screwing over a portion of their population is the problem. Racists will call this a 'demographics' problem because they're wanting to get rid of a particular demographic. Is this not what you said? Lol. I guess it's okay when you do it.
Anonymous
>>1256707 Because thats somehow equivalent to
>if any black person anywhere ever fails to achieve greatness it's because a white somewhere made them fail Go fuck yourself to death, you disingenuous troon
Anonymous
>>1256704 >>1256696 Anon, I'm the one who posted
>>1256693 I made the point that the incidence of adverse outcomes of black people in the US are independent of the government..
You set up a strawman of white leadership in southern states causing this, but what about, oh idk, Chicago? It's ran by black democrats and has been for a while.
I've shown you that once again, the common thread here is the demographics, not the leadership.
Anonymous
>>1256710 It absolutely is. Saying it's "white people controlling the government's" fault that black people are poor is basically saying it's the fault of white people exclusively.
Anonymous
>>1256716 Not only that but it ignores the agency of the black population, reasoning that the sum of their circumstance is wholly the responsibility of white people
Anonymous
>>1256653 >>1256675 >Just starve because you can't afford food >And the Republicans are there to make sure your kids starve too! How nice of you.
Anonymous
>>1256723 The Government is incapable of keeping you down.
Biden isn't negatively affecting you at all.
Anonymous
>>1256714 You're presuming correlation is related to causation.
These same states are also the core of the old confederacy, the same retardation that caused the secession could easily be the cause of those states being so shittily run.
Anonymous
>>1256729 Is this the best you can do?
>>1256723 Precisely. It's saying without saying that Blacks are incapable of being responsible for themselves, and tacitly revealing that Democrats look at blacks as nothing more than indolent children who cannot be held responsible for their own behavior.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256730 I don't recall Chicago seceding from the Union.
Nor do I recall Detroit, or Gary, or Compton, or East LA, or Baltimore, or Philadelphia or...
Anonymous
>>1256737 >Precisely. It's saying without saying that republicans are incapable of being responsible for themselves, and tacitly revealing that republicans look at themselves as nothing more than indolent children who cannot be held responsible for their own behavior. Fixed to cover your BDS
Anonymous
>>1256740 BDS? "Blame Democrats Syndrome"?
Funny. Aren't we currently dealing with someone suffering from terminal Blame Whitey Syndrome?
Anonymous
>>1256741 its telling that you're racist enough to assume that dismissing your 'blacks cause all problems' bullshit means I blame white people for all problems.
Anonymous
>>1256742 I'm not saying blacks cause -all- of their problems, I'm pointing out (and correctly, I might add) that you -do- in fact blame whites for all of the problems blacks have. You have explicitly said as much yourself when you made this post:
>>1256696 >You'd maybe have a point if those southern states didn't have white people controlling the government. >Racist leaders deliberately screwing over a portion of their population is the problem. Racists will call this a 'demographics' problem because they're wanting to get rid of a particular demographic. You are stating very clearly that the crux of the issue with Blacks living in 'southern states' stems from 'white people controlling the government' and such persons are "Racist leaders deliberately screwing over a portion of their population"
Anonymous
>>1256744 Shitty leadership is the problem.
Your claim that its blacks causing the problem doesn't make sense since they're basically never in leadership positions.
Anonymous
>>1256745 They don't need to be in a leadership position in order to govern their own lives. And again you fail to accept that you've made incorrect assumptions about my argument that you cannot even back up. Congrats. Keep doubling down. It's how I know you've lost the argument.
Anonymous
>>1256747 Its still fucking hilarious you can shit that out given Republicunts consistently bitching about Biden.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256748 What does that have to do with the argument?
Anonymous
>>1256725 why should I be robbed of my labor just because you are a lazy piece of shit?
Anonymous
>>1256750 You're already being robbed of your labor by your corporate master, but you're a good goy. Fight your fellow man and not the corporation that has a boot on neck.
Anonymous
>>1256752 >agree to work for set amount of time for set amount of pay >"U ROBBED MEEEEE!!!11111one" Anonymous
>>1256752 I don't work for a corporation. lazy fucks who spend all their money on drugs and refuse to feed their kids do not deserve my labor you cocksucker
Anonymous
>>1256725 so do you expect us to ignore the fact that you just admitted you're such a sheltered child that you think working a regular job is the same as slavery? kek. Are you even old enough to post here without violating Rule 2?
Anonymous
>>1256753 If minimum wage was a living wage as it was created to be, then no one would have room to complain.
But it's not a living wage so, yeah.
Anonymous
>>1256758 You damn well know he's not. I think everyone who argues from the side of supporting Democrats has to be either an underaged child, a paid foreign shill, or a sheltered NEET. The more you debate with them, the more blatantly obvious it becomes that none of them have done things such as filed insurance claims, used any form of US healthcare, purchased a home, or car, or even filed income taxes. It's like talking to people that have either gotten 100% of their knowledge from MSNBC and Mother Jones or are running off a script.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256765 True facts. It's ridiculous.
Anonymous
>>1256764 Then don't work for minimum wage, retard. Work for higher than that.
Anonymous
>>1256768 HE DID IT GUYS, HE FIGURED OUT THE ANSWER TO HOMELESSNESS.
great job! You're right up there with GENIUS Paris Hilton who said "if you are homeless, just buy a house"
We don't deserve your keen intellectual mind.
Anonymous
>>1256764 a. just don't work minimum wage, retard
b. why the fuck do we need to import millions of third world illegals to "do the jobs Americans won't" for less than minimum wage if minimum wage isn't even livable?
Anonymous
>>1256754 >>1256758 >I don't work for a corporation >As he defends corporations It's not nice to lie on 4chan.
Anonymous
>>1256805 you replied to 2 different people, fag
Anonymous
>>1256802 A. Minimum wage is meant to be a living wage. That's how fucking FDR intended it to be when he created min wage in 1938 with the fair labor standards act.
B. Let's stick to one argument at a time.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256812 Then it's not working anymore. Time to get rid of it.
Anonymous
>>1256799 Nobody is fucking forcing you to work at minimum wage, dumbass. If you're still at minimum wage in your 30s and 40s then you fucked up somewhere along the line. There reaches a point where you cannot save stupid people from themselves, no matter the amount of government intervention.
Anonymous
>>1256812 >A. Minimum wage is meant to be a living wage. That's how fucking FDR intended it to be FDR is an evil piece of shit who hated America
>B. Let's stick to one argument at a time. no. the reasons wages are so shit is because you import millions of third worlders on h1b visas and as illegals and pay them under the minimum wage and have them do illegally unsafe actitivies and because you have all these nonAmericans around it lowers the price of labor. jacking up the minimum wage to $30 would just end up with you demanding more illegals to work for $2 an hour and saying they do the jobs Americans won't.
Anonymous
>>1256814 The point here is, it should be enough for someone to work at and LIVE THEIR FUCKING LIVES, that's what a living wage is.
It doesn't matter what fucking age someone is, an INDIVIDUAL should be able to get A job, and survive comfortably off of it.
If you can't get onboard with that, don't even reply back dude, that boot is too far down your throat.
Anonymous
>>1256817 Illegal immigrants bring down the minimum wage just like raising the minimum wage increases the price of a big mac. Surprise, neither of those are based in reality.
Anonymous
>>1256821 the price of a big mac literally went up in cities/states that raised the minimum wage for fast food workers to $15/hr or $22/hr
https://nypost.com/2023/10/31/opinion/mcdonalds-new-prices-chart-big-mac-size-toll-of-bidenomics/ If there were fewer people competing for jobs, hell if you just had people who didn't compete illegally below the minimum wage and no pay taxes, then wages would go up. But illegals are literally scabs
Anonymous
>>1256822 Surprise, the nytimes reporting on the negative impacts of taking money from them. Who owns the nytimes again? I wonder who. Credible source plz.
Also, if you want to talk about those not paying taxes, go after your Corp daddies, they owe more than every illegal combined.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256823 so again, you are sucking illegal cock and demanding they come in, work for less than minimum wage and not pay any taxes and therefore suppress wages and then you want me to pay taxes to give to lazy fucks instead?
fuck off chang
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256820 Yeah well looks like it's not, and you need to have better standards for yourself. Working at Wendy's all your adult life was a bad choice, but you made it. Too bad.
Anonymous
>>1256327 Feeding children will in fact prevent their starvation.
Anonymous
>>1256843 Gee I bet we'll need a government program to do this. I don't know how we ever managed to feed children without one!
Anonymous
>>1256855 Children have always starved. They shouldn't have to. The government can easily prevent this.
Anonymous
>>1256867 Will we hire people to physically place the food into their mouths for them, too?
Anonymous
>>1256875 Nah, America isn't some right wing shithole where government goons control what you eat.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256880 No, it's just a left wing shithole where government goons control what you say, think, and own.
Anonymous
>>1256808 You're both corporate bootlickers
Anonymous
>>1256901 And you're a government bootlicker.
Anonymous
>>1256880 why would a right wing government control people's lives in any way?
>>1256901 not wanting to be forced at gun point to give my labor to lazy faggots who buy drugs and refuse to feed their kids somehow has shit to do with corporations? that makes no sense, government cocksucker
Anonymous
>>1256913 >why would a right wing government control people's lives in any way? Pot and abortion. Inb4 those don't count because your mistresses are on the pill and cops don't arrest white people for drug use.
Anonymous
>>1256913 >why would a right wing government control people's lives in any way? Conservatives play this childish little mental trick where they think that their habit of stripping people of positive freedoms isn't controlling people's lives. Their ideology is basically to drop someone off in a desert with no food, clothes or water and say "Hey look! You're free! You can do whatever you want!" I mean, they aren't technically incorrect but the freedom isn't worth much when you live in a society that works directly against your upwards mobility. This is what they accomplish every time they shut down public health initiatives, public assistance, jobs programs, rehab programs, infrastructure programs, food stamps, free lunch for kids, public healthcare etc., They strip people of opportunities to make something of themselves and try to mask it as freedom. Its a very strange definition of "control", that's for sure. This also isn't even mentioning all of the the actual negative freedoms they try to enforce on people i.e. banning trans medicine for adults, banning books and history lessons they don't like, banning abortion etc.,
Anonymous
>>1257025 Type less like you're crying
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1257029 >No argument I accept your concession
Anonymous
>>1257021 literally all violent criminal smoke pot and there is a direct link between weed usage and violence
abortion is murder
Anonymous
>>1257025 so republicans are bad because they strip people of the freedom of owning slaves? because you're entire argument is that you believe you have the right to other people's labor
Anonymous
>>1257037 Red states are overwhelmingly the worst in terms of taxes paid vs aid received.
Your acting like Republicans are some high and mighty political force instead of incompetent indolent corrupt dullards that ruin anything they are put in charge of is farcical.
And paying into the public good isn't slavery, but I encourage you to find a rock to swim out to if you believe otherwise so nobody's funds find their way to benefit you. You wouldn't want to be a slave driver, would you?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1257040 >Public good Defunct concept
Anonymous
>>1257040 >Red states are overwhelmingly the worst in terms of taxes paid vs aid received. the opposite. Kentucky gets back more money from the feds than anyone else. Also literally what the fuck do taxes and welfare (both of which should be banned) have to do with the fact right wing governments don't control people's lives in any way, left wing governments do? you are trying to change the topic since you got btfo'd
>Your acting like Republicans are some high and mighty political force instead of incompetent indolent corrupt dullards that ruin anything they are put in charge of is farcical. you literally got fucked out of 3 scotus judges by a dementia patient from kentucky
>And paying into the public good isn't slavery, it is. it is by force without consent and it is theft of labor
Anonymous
>>1257036 >literally all violent criminal smoke pot and there is a direct link between weed usage and violence This is your brain on lead which incidentally correlates more with violent crime than anything. Isolate yourself from society before you inevitably snap.
Anonymous
>>1257036 Pot plants don't kill people. People kill people.
>>1257043 >Kentucky gets back more money from the feds than anyone else What the fuck do you think that means, lead case?
Anonymous
>>1257046 I'm not black so I don't drink lead water
>>1257047 yeah, people who smoke pot
Anonymous
>>1257047 >What the fuck do you think that means, lead case? it means all your jewish democrat politicians like schumer, obongo, biden and sanders got bent over a barrel and sodomized by a demented boomer and a 5'6" eye doctor with chia pet hair, because dems are literally more retarded than people from kentucky
Anonymous
>>1257025 What the fuck is "positive" and "negative" freedoms outside of the concept of the constitution and how it limits what the government is allowed to do to us?
Anonymous
>>1257040 We are getting close to a point where these systems can no longer be sustained and no amount of taxation of the wealthy will make up for the gap in the income vs expenditure.
Republicans are not banning "trans medicine for adults" nor are they banning books, or "history lessons they don't like."
As far as abortion is concerned, lol.
You'd be surprised about the number of women there are in the pro-life movement. Even still Democrats had decades to codify abortion into law, but wouldn't because they didn't want to have it limited to 4-12 weeks or lose something they could use to pull in voters.
Anonymous
>>1257050 Positive freedoms = dependencies on the state, paid for by taxpayers
Negative freedoms = that which grants the individual autonomy
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1257050 positive freedoms = owning slaves
negative freedoms = cutting off your child's penis, being able to live near white people, murdering your children and being able to have access to children in a library while wearing a dress
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1257052 >dependencies on the state, paid for by taxpayers so slave labor
Anonymous
>>1257048 >I'm not black so I don't drink lead water https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetraethyllead This is your brain on lead.
>>1257049 Nah, pretty sure you just can't read.
Anonymous
>>1257051 >We are getting close to a point where these systems can no longer be sustained No.
Anonymous
>>1257060 leaded gas has been banned for nearly 30 years retard. and even then it maily affected blacks.
>Nah, pretty sure you just can't read. no, you are just mad you got cucked by kentucky
Anonymous
>>1257063 >leaded gas has been banned for nearly 30 years retard. and even then it maily affected blacks. The implication here is that you're under 30. And also that you don't live in a polluted shithole.
Brother, this is 4chan, not a confessional. There's no need to lie.
Anonymous
>>1257066 again, I am not black so I don't live in a polluted shithole
Anonymous
>>1256324 Children have no societal utility.
Poor children in particular have really low prospect in life.
It's better to let them die young than to torture them over half a century.
It would have been better if they were not born at all, of course.
Anonymous
>>1257068 Didn't deny being old, lmao.
Also I love that you praise Kentucky for draining tax funds while bitching about poor kids getting money for food.
The brain rot's severe with you.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1257071 the only people who got lead poisoning lived near highways and were black. and fuck taxing people for welfare that is some gay ass slavery shit. But since kentucky can't end all taxes, mitch and rand are doing a good job fuck biden and schumer in the face to take everything they can from ny
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256324 good thing you dont live there faggot europoor redditor
Anonymous
>>1257061 LOL you honestly think that we can keep importing low-IQ dregs and afford to house and clothe them all?
Anonymous
>>1256907 >>1256913 Government is trying to keep kids from starving, at least the part that's not a corperate bootlicker like the Republicans and you.
Anonymous
>>1257070 Studies show that if you give them a social safety net, they end up being a net positive for society.
>>1251966 Anonymous
>>1257080 not a peer reviewed study, literally made up. welfare has never helped a single human ever
>>1257079 use your own money faggot, stop stealing mine you cocksucker
Anonymous
>>1257075 Let's see
>Clothing is one of the biggest producers of commercial waste >We've a home surplus >We have a massive food surplus Yes, but of course you're talking about paying for it, to which I point at the fact that the wealth gap has ballooned massively parallel to dumbass trickle down tax cut bullshit over the past half century.
So yeah, we have both the money and resources to do exactly that and you'd have to be a brain poisoned invalid to think otherwise.
Anonymous
>>1257082 >Stop stealing by wage slave money! LOL
Anonymous
>>1256349 That’s what I see too. Louisville and Lexington are diverse. That’s where the problem is. Democrats like to keep black people on the plantation.
Anonymous
>>1257083 >We've a home surplus Because the economy is in the gutter, retard.
Nobody can afford a home because the labor market is diluted with immigrants who drastically undercut domestic competition.
You faggots keep crying about the wealthy while directly voting for policians which make them wealthy.
Anonymous
>>1257106 You mean Republicans given the states are run by them.
Or do you mean conservatives since only an intellectually bankrupt shill would pretend a political party can't change ideologically. Which is what happened after the Civil Rights Act was passed.
Anonymous
>>1256324 Man republicans really hate children
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1257107 You don't understand. In his mind those homes exist to be taken away and given away. Same with clothing, medical care, and food. Damn the people that had anything to do with it's production.
>>1257108 Yeah those Democrats changed so much ideologically that they went from blaming all the problems on people with a certain skin color to blaming all the problems on people with a certain skin color. Or how they went from wanting to live off the produce of someone else's labor to wanting to live off the produce of someone else's labor.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1257083 >no, we need to import every third world piece of shit and let them rule as kings and get everything for free off the back of white slaves fuck you, get a job and use your own money
>Yes, but of course you're talking about paying for it, to which I point at the fact that the wealth gap has ballooned massively parallel to dumbass trickle down tax cut bullshit over the past half century. literally caused by the move to fiat currency from the gold standard, the new deal and the "great society" welfare package
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1257084 again, I don't work for a corporation, faggot. plus you want illegals to literally work for slave wages
Anonymous
>>1257108 no, its the democrats. they shit up every single city they control
Anonymous
>>1257115 >if you are anti slavery you are anti children just make it illegal to not feed your kids. the only reason kids are starving is because their parents are lazy and waste their money on drugs
Anonymous
>>1257215 Democrats are like women. So in that sense it is the Republican's fault that things are so bad, because the Republican are supposed to be men. Democrats, like women, are not supposed to be held accountable for their actions. If they're going to do something stupid, or wrong, then it's the duty of the Men aka the Republicans to step in and make sure there's no negative consequences for their actions. While still allowing them to feel all girlboss-y.
Tell me; when was the last time you've ever heard a Democrat admit that something they advocated for was a bad idea? When have you ever heard them accept responsibility when one of their own, or they themselves make a mistake? Same as with women. If something bad happened, it was the fault of the men/Republicans. If you have an issue with something that's going wrong, then it's because you're complaining too much and need to "Man up."
How anyone could sit here and claim that it's a good thing that there's an entire party made up of people that have absolved themselves of any responsibility is absurd. They are insane. These same people also want to have top down control of every aspect of your life while also being held to no standards of accountability.
Any time you point out that a city has been run by Democrats for decades and the city is an absolutely irredeemable Hellscape, they never accept that maybe has been some fault in their reasoning, or bad actors have invaded their party and used their brand for ill. Oh no. There's always a Republican somewhere, somehow that can be held responsible for it all. It's never them. Ever.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1257216 Don't forget it's standard Democrat policy to offer programs like this and then cut them off if Republican state legislators go against their agenda.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1257108 The "great realignment" never happened and is based entirely on a handful of Democrats switching parties because they found religion and realized being a Democrat was unChristian.
Anonymous
>>1257239 >Democrats are like women. Unwilling to fuck you?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1257300 >immediately goes to sex Spoken just like a women.
Anonymous
>>1257239 That's a lot of words to tell everyone you know nothing about women.
Anonymous
>>1257409 That's all the words you need to use to tell me you're a simp.
Anonymous
>>1257479 Hey buddy, great job regurgitating exactly what I said.
Anonymous
>>1257515 I get it already; you're a simp.
Anonymous
>>1257524 Aww, what a big boy, he said simp twice! He knows that word really well. I wonder if he can say anything new or if he's developmentally challenged.
Anonymous
>>1257527 Now you're a faggot.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256523 Thats about 1/1000th of the amount that have died from OD's in Seattle.
Anonymous
>>1256324 They call it "summer EBT" as if EBT is canceled during the summer or something. We all know this is a roundabout subsidy to the blunt wrap industry.
Also, it's $40 per child and the article says that "millions of children" could lose out on the benefit, so that's $80 million minimum, maybe as high as over a billion. Shouldn't they be sending that to the Ukraine to save Our Democracy?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1257598 You know damn well they're not gonna send it to fix the water for their poor little pets.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1257586 And yet you come back to me, really explains you not knowing shit about women. No judgement! It is 2024 after all.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1256324 This has been their policy since Reagan, where the fuck have you been