https://www.huffpost.com/entry/congress-republicans-alejandro-mayorkas-impeachment-border-deal-failures_n_65c2d67ae4b093b2e7816d96 WASHINGTON ― Tuesday was a deeply embarrassing day for Republicans in the U.S. Capitol.
House Speaker Mike Johnson’s big push to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas failed spectacularly following high drama and yelling on the House floor, falling short by just one vote. Minutes later, a Republican bill to send U.S. aid to Israel went down in flames due to bipartisan opposition. Earlier in the day, Senate Republicans officially killed the border security package the party had cried out for only months earlier.
“I would have thought they would have known [the whip count]. They’re good on the other side of that,” Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), a member of the far-right House Freedom Caucus, told reporters after the impeachment vote failed. “Is it that hard?”
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) all but said Democrats outsmarted Republicans by not telling them how many of their members would be present for the impeachment vote. Rep. Al Green (D-Texas) had been absent for medical reasons but unexpectedly appeared Tuesday for the vote. His vote made all the difference in tanking the impeachment effort.
“They hid one of their members,” Greene told reporters after the vote. “Waiting till the last minute, watching to see our votes, trying to throw us off on the numbers that we had versus the numbers they had. So, yeah, that was a strategy in play tonight.”
Anonymous
The trio of failures, just over a month into a presidential election year where they hope to project competence and win over swing voters disappointed in President Joe Biden, combines to paint a grim picture of the GOP’s ability to govern. Instead, the party is showing voters a House leader who can’t count votes, a Senate leader who is incapable of persuading his conference and a party that is both unwilling to compromise with Democrats and unable to wrangle votes for its own agenda. “There used to be a difference between the Senate Republican caucus and the House Republican caucus,” Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) told reporters earlier in the day. “There is no difference. They are just as dysfunctional. They are just as tied to President Trump.” The Mayorkas vote was the real surprise, a nail-biter of a vote that was tied at 215 to 215 for several minutes as Republicans tried to persuade party holdouts to join them. Everyone knew it would be close, but GOP leaders were already struggling to hold their party together before they realized that Al Green was present. “Yeah, they may have been caught a little bit off-guard,” Rep. Carlos Giménez (R-Fla.) said of Republican leaders botching the impeachment vote count. “Gotta take your hat off to the Democratic leadership for doing that.” The final vote was 216-214, as one Republican switched to allow a potential revote once the GOP was sure it had enough votes. A Johnson spokesperson later tweeted that they would indeed try again “when we have the votes for passage.” They’re counting on the return of House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.), who has been receiving cancer treatments, to be the extra vote they need to impeach Mayorkas.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
The tied impeachment vote even had some members of the GOP caucus questioning one of the few congressional successes of recent months, the ouster of Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.), the federally indicted serial fabulist. The presence of either Santos or former Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), who resigned from his seat rather than remain a rank-and-file member, likely would’ve given the GOP enough votes to impeach Mayorkas.>Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) said Republicans have to ask themselves if “expelling George Santos was actually worth it,” according to a reporter for The Independent. Santos, meanwhile, taunted the GOP from the sidelines. “Miss me yet?” Santos tweeted, along with a photo of the tied impeachment vote in the House. The failure of the Israel aid package, which was backed strongly by Johnson, was less surprising but added to the chaos nevertheless. It was brought to a vote under a procedure that required it to garner a two-thirds supermajority instead of a simple majority. With Biden threatening a veto of the bill Monday night, there was no incentive for even pro-Israel Democrats to cross over. Republicans could bring up the bill for a regular vote as early as next week, but they face internal opposition from hard-liners who don’t like the package’s $17.6 billion cost. Over in the Senate, Republicans officially announced plans to filibuster bipartisan compromise legislation seeking to secure the U.S.-Mexico border after a right-wing backlash, including attacks from former President Donald Trump. The bill included reforms that the GOP demanded months ago to address what the party called a national security crisis: the wave of migrants on the border But now, with an agreement sealed by conservative Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) and endorsed by the U.S. Border Patrol union, many Republicans maintain that it’s better to wait until after the November election to secure the border, when Trump might be back in the White House.
Anonymous
>>1264325 >HuffingDemCumPost.com Ignored.
And no, it was a pretty good day.
No aid for Israel. No shitty border deal that wouldn't change anything and a Homeland security traitor so bad he missed being impeached by 1 vote.
ChuggingCumPost sure does like it's spin though.
Anonymous
Murphy, who spent months crafting the deal with Lankford, vented about their reversal as soon as the bill was unveiled. “How can you trust any Republicans right now?” Murphy said. “They told us what to do. We followed their instructions to the letter. And then they pulled the rug out from under us in 24 hours.” Even some GOP senators expressed disappointment with their party’s decision to abandon the border deal, which put into serious jeopardy U.S. support for both Israel and Ukraine. Without the provisions toughening border enforcement, it’s not clear how either foreign aid package passes in Congress. “Politics used to be the art of the possible. Now it’s the art of the impossible,” Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) lamented. “Meaning, let’s put forward proposals that can’t possibly pass so we can say to our respective bases, ‘Look how I’m fighting for you. These are things that will never happen, but I’m fighting for you.’” He added: “We’ve gone from the sublime to the ridiculous.” Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), another GOP centrist who supported the border deal, observed, “Congress is getting really good at failing well.”
Anonymous
>>1264329 >No aid for Israel. No shitty border deal that wouldn't change anything and a Homeland security traitor so bad he missed being impeached by 1 vote. Refusing to help America's allies, no border deal where Democrats gave Republicans everything they wanted, and a a failed witch hunt.
LOL
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1264330 >“How can you trust any Republicans right now?” Murphy said. “They told us what to do. We followed their instructions to the letter. And then they pulled the rug out from under us in 24 hours.” Look I appreciate that Senator Murphy tried, but this republicans have always been evil.
My accelerationist plan is working
Quoted By:
>>1264325 tRump isnt even POTUS yet,and He's already effin' it all up.
Anonymous
>>1264329 >No aid for Israel Republicunts were the ones gagging to give it to them. You can thank Democrats here.
Anonymous
>>1264343 Being anti-Israel is their one good thing.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1264325 I'M OUTRAGED!1 THEY OUGHT TO APOLOGIZE!11
Anonymous
>>1264345 This is why Bernie is the Best.
Support Ukraine, defund Israel. He's anti war crimes.
Unlike Trump who want to defund Ukraine and fund Israeli war crimes.
Anonymous
>>1264348 >Support Ukraine Move your ass to the ukrainian front, you coward piece of shit.
Anonymous
>>1264345 Republicans have crafted a bill to give billions to Israel in a separate motion. Republicans love to cozy up to the power of Israel. And Trump likes Netanyahu so they will give him whatever he wants.
Anonymous
>>1264352 I'll still never vote Democrat again.
Anonymous
>>1264350 Big problems require collective action. it's far more effective for me to stay here and call out the Republicans for being traitorous bastards for supporting Russia and to support my local Democratic politicians who do back Ukraine, so that the entire resources of the United States can be mobilized to assist Ukraine collectively.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>huffpost Tabloids aren't news.
Anonymous
>>1264367 I think you could kill 10,000 Russians like a Marvel superhero.
Ukraine needs that right now.
Anonymous
>>1264357 Russians can't vote.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1264371 They can in Russia, Ukrainian Ivan.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1264369 It's a shame Republican cut funding because they're in the pocket of Putin.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Burn all republicans. Russian bought traitors. All of them.
Anonymous
>>1264325 >a Republican bill to send U.S. aid to Israel went down in flames due to bipartisan opposition. based, fuck israel
>Senate Republicans officially killed the border security package the party had cried out for only months earlier. the senate bill was shit and made it so nearly 2 million illegals could come into the US every year
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1264326 >>1264330 >murphy bill got torpedoed good, that piece of shit is a chinese asset who hates America. fuck him I hope he gets cancer
Anonymous
>>1264492 t. retarded faggot who thinks every illegal who tries to cross the border automatically gets in and then buys a new house with all the money they don't have
Anonymous
>>1264526 no illegals should be allowed in at all.
Anonymous
>>1264528 Sorry, thats a Democrat idea so you have to oppose it.
So sorry. Try again later.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1264526 why would an illegal need to buy anything? theyre literally given millions of dollars worth of property the moment they walk into the US by democucks
Anonymous
Quoted By:
maybe it's too tough to come in legally have we tried printing the forms in spanish
Anonymous
>>1264530 again, the bill would allow in nearly 2 million illegals per year before the president "could" do anything, not has to, could. so biden would just have left the borders open like he is now. fucker literally is trying to cut the razor wire in texas because he wants more illegals coming in because dems are open borders
Anonymous
>>1264534 Big if true
Source for the new bill letting in 2 million immigrants and automatically letting them stay in the country?
Or are you a lying faggot who is making stuff up?
I already read the bill so I know is the latter, but lets see how poor your reading comprehension really is, ESL Anonymous
>>1264536 >up to 5000 crossings per day permitted >majority of crossings will result in an asylum claim Anonymous
>>1264534 >literally is trying to cut the razor wire in texas because the US constitution requires him to assert Federal control over the border fixed that for you, Ivan
Real Americans who understand the constitution know that the lame governor in Texas is placing the razorwire illegally
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1264536 I'm confused why text exists that outlines up to 5k illegals a day is authorized.
Anonymous
>>1264538 Hey look at that, the faggot has to insert his own faggotry in order to make his lies make sense.
The bill also adds 5k asylum processors, up from the few hundred we currently have, to kill the backlog and allow for same day asylum claims.
So a majority of those crossings will result in an asylum claim that will be rejected on average and result in deportation.
Which is bad for Republicunts, since they love illegal labor and bitching about a problem they create.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Bipartisan implies both sides were willing to vote for it. What was bipartisan here, exactly?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1264536 the bill doesn't let the president do anything until there is an average of 5,000 illegals per day
5,000*365 = 1,825,000. That is way too many illegals.
>>1264539 the razor wire is mega based, chang. there is literally ZERO downside to having it up
Anonymous
>>1264542 >So a majority of those crossings will result in an asylum claim that will be rejected on average and result in deportation. Wrong
>Asylum has been granted in about 40% of the nearly 700,000 asylum cases that have been decided since 2000. Immigration judges in that time frame approved about 30% of the applications, or about 420,000 cases, filed by people in deportation proceedings after arriving at the border or after being apprehended within the U.S. Anonymous
>>1264546 >Immigration judges in that time frame approved about 30% of the applications So 70% were declined?
Thanks for your concession, faggot
Anonymous
>>1264542 >The bill also adds 5k asylum processors who is appointing them? because if its biden they will just rubber stamp all illegals, because dems love illegals so long as they are in red towns/states
Anonymous
>>1264549 You're just making shit up now.
Anonymous
>>1264548 >ha! You only codified 40% of 1.6 million illegal crossings per year! >HA! Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1264549 They are removing it from immigration judges and assigning it to random paper pushers at USCIS. So we get like zero oversight.
Anonymous
>>1264548 No, thats 70% of the 40% who were considered, so more like 12% of total asylum seekers are ultimately approved per that quote.
>>1264553 12% of 1.6million is 192k, which is about half of the current immigration rate.
Republicunts love immigration so much they rejected an offer to halve it.
Anonymous
>>1264555 >40% are approved >no its 12% because reasons Anonymous
>>1264555 there are zero legit asylum seekers from latin America and we both know biden won't limit it to 5,000 a day, because the bill doesn't require that, just says he can and we know his appointed processers will rubber stamp claims and have a 100% approval rate.
Anonymous
>>1264557 Shhh, Americans are talking.
ESLs should be quiet if they can't read.
Anonymous
>>1264551 yeah, I totally trust the same people who made red flag laws that have a 97% approval rate to have objective processors who correctly apply the law when flooding the country with illegals
Anonymous
>>1264558 >>1264560 >it doesn't matter what the bill says, only my feelings! faggots
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1264559 >Immigration judges in that time frame approved about 30% of the applications, or about 420,000 cases, filed by people in deportation proceedings Take your own advice.
>Be placed in deportation proceeding >apply for asylum >have 30% chance of it being approved You accusing others of ESL while yourself misreading something is beyond hilarious. Blown the fuck out by two commas.
Anonymous
>>1264561 where does the bill say they are going to only have a 12% asylum approval rate?
Anonymous
>>1264563 In the same section where you're claiming we have a 100% approval rate for asylum seekers
Anonymous
>>1264564 I didn't say we had a 100% approval rate, I said if they are being appointed by biden they will have a 100% approval rate because obongo and biden judges just rubber stamp shit.
why don't we compromise, we can have the bill, but all illegals must live in only blue cities in blue states and if they leave the blue city they get deported
Anonymous
>>1264565 >why don't we compromise because Republicunts are faggots who don't know the meaning of compromise
The only immigration bill they'll be willing to pass is the one they can do by themselves without any input from Democrats.
Hint: The last time they've been able to pass a bill like that was about 100 years ago. Its not going to happen again.
Anonymous
>>1264567 100 years ago we didn't have immigration from shithole countries because there were quotas. dems then opened the border in the second half of the 20th century
Anonymous
>>1264568 100 years ago they weren't shithole countries because Republicans hadn't yet had the CIA cripple them for cheap labor.
Its all bitching about problems you create. Its like watching a fat person complain while refusing to diet or exercise.
Anonymous
>>1264583 they were always shithole countries. the CIA thing is literally a conspiracy theory
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1264325 When RethugliKKKLans lose, we all win.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1264585 cia death squads is a real thing, it's just that communists weren't much better in any case and they both exploited south america for their gain over the other superpower
Anonymous
>Republicans get Democrats to cave on everything. >This is still considered a bad deal with Republicans who kill the bill This is bad comedy.
Anonymous
>>1264614 >If I intentionally misinterpret reality everyone else must too Only if you're in the matrix, faggot.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1264615 >If I intentionally misinterpret reality everyone else must too But enough about Republicans
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1264325 >A Republican bill Oh so now that people have read it the amnesty bill is a REPUBLICAN bill instead of Biden "doing something about the border".
>Huffpo link Kek good trolling
Anonymous
>>1264335 >Everything they wanted Thousands of illegals per day being admitted and states losing the authority to police the border themselves? Really? Nah retard.
Anonymous
>>1264348 >Commie He's not even a person. You could watch him get eaten by a bear and feel nothing.
Anonymous
>>1264626 Biden was going to shut down the boarders and immigration is a Federal issue.
You gave away everything.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1264555 In exchange for giving up the ability to stop the flow entirely. You have had this explained to you repeatedly.
Anonymous
>>1264629 No he wasn't and it no longer is. Sorry sweetie, Texas is a sanctuary state for closed borders now. You set this precedent yourself, now you and only you will have to deal with smelly wetbacks in your state. It is, as the kids say, BUSSIN'.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1264627 I would feel childlike joy and wonder seeing a communist provide actual value to another living thing for once.
Anonymous
>>1264634 Really shitty damage control for Trump blowing up a bipartisan immigration deal
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1264634 Texas is just addicted to being edgy faggots who need a good shitkicking every now and again.
The United States has never lost a war against Mexico, but Texas did. And after they lost they whined to the US, gave up their independence, and got to pretend they're badasses again when, in reality, they were and always will be impotent blubbery pussies.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Reminder every time a shill says "good post", Biden gets 1,000,000 more votes in battleground states on election day.
Anonymous
>>1264639 Then they lost to American again when they betrayed the union to keep the racist institution of slavery.
Conservatism, not even once.
Anonymous
>>1264647 They haven't lost a war since turning red. Imagine that. Losing wars must be a Democrat thing.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1264669 interesting mental gymnastics.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1264669 not a democrat, just relaying the facts
Anonymous
>>1264669 They've always been conservative, but you're using the classic conservatism trick of pretending political parties are monolith and not taking responsibility for your own sins.
Anonymous
>>1264639 >The United States has never lost a war against Mexico, but Texas did. And after they lost they whined to the US, gave up their independence, and got to pretend they're badasses again when, in reality, they were and always will be impotent blubbery pussies. Literally what the fuck history is this?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1264751 >they have always been conservative LOL, lmao even. They were solid New Deal Democrats a.k.a Progressive as FUCK.
Your knowledge of political history is dogshit.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1264329 >Hehe... N-None of our talking points matter this week anyway. Also your news sources are AI hallucination anyway. How can zoomers be so dumb.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1264763 The history they don't teach in Texas