[39 / 1 / 20]
241KiB, 1600x900, 11californiatoday-newsom-wvfm-videoSixteenByNineJumbo1600[1].jpg
it must really suck for Newsom he mad it so gay raping someone isn't a crime anymore. hell, it isn't even a crime to gay rape someone and give them aids in california
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/privacy-and-data-security/en-banc-review-of-california-kids-gun-case-denied-by-9th-circuit
https://dailycaller.com/2024/02/20/gavin-newsom-anti-gun-censorship-effort-just-took-loss-court/
The order came down today; it noted that no judge called for a vote on the en banc rehearing petition.
California Restriction on Gun Ads That "Reasonably Appear[] to Be Attractive to Minors" Likely Unconstitutional
From Junior Sports Magazines, Inc. v. Bonta, decided today [Sept, 13, 2023] by Ninth Circuit Judge Kenneth Lee, joined by Judges Randy Smith and Lawrence VanDyke:
This case is not about whether children can buy firearms. (They cannot under California law.) Nor is this case about whether minors can legally use firearms. (California allows minors under adult supervision to possess and use firearms for hunting, target practice, and other activities.) And this case is not about whether California has tools to combat the scourge of youth gun violence. (It does.)
Rather, this case is about whether California can ban a truthful ad about firearms used legally by adults and minors—just because the ad "reasonably appears to be attractive to minors." So, for example, an ad showcasing a safer hunting rifle with less recoil for minors would likely be unlawful in California. Under our First Amendment jurisprudence, states can ban truthful and lawful advertising only if it "materially" and "directly" advances a substantial government interest and is no more extensive than necessary. California likely cannot meet this high bar.
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/privacy-and-data-security/en-banc-review-of-california-kids-gun-case-denied-by-9th-circuit
https://dailycaller.com/2024/02/20/gavin-newsom-anti-gun-censorship-effort-just-took-loss-court/
The order came down today; it noted that no judge called for a vote on the en banc rehearing petition.
California Restriction on Gun Ads That "Reasonably Appear[] to Be Attractive to Minors" Likely Unconstitutional
From Junior Sports Magazines, Inc. v. Bonta, decided today [Sept, 13, 2023] by Ninth Circuit Judge Kenneth Lee, joined by Judges Randy Smith and Lawrence VanDyke:
This case is not about whether children can buy firearms. (They cannot under California law.) Nor is this case about whether minors can legally use firearms. (California allows minors under adult supervision to possess and use firearms for hunting, target practice, and other activities.) And this case is not about whether California has tools to combat the scourge of youth gun violence. (It does.)
Rather, this case is about whether California can ban a truthful ad about firearms used legally by adults and minors—just because the ad "reasonably appears to be attractive to minors." So, for example, an ad showcasing a safer hunting rifle with less recoil for minors would likely be unlawful in California. Under our First Amendment jurisprudence, states can ban truthful and lawful advertising only if it "materially" and "directly" advances a substantial government interest and is no more extensive than necessary. California likely cannot meet this high bar.
