Soon as they can't lie, they suddenly have nothing bad to say about Democrats.
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/i-dont-recall-attorney-who-previously-said-fulton-county-da-absolutely-began-dating-trump-rico-special-prosecutor-before-hiring-him-has-sustained-memory-lapse-in-court/ An unforced tactical error by a special prosecutor working for the Fulton County District Attorney’s Office led to a bit of a wash in court on Tuesday afternoon during a pretrial hearing in the racketeering (RICO) case against Donald Trump and others.
“I don’t recall,” was the phrase du jour during testimony from divorce attorney Terrence Bradley as he answered question after question about a litany of issues regarding the romantic relationship between District Attorney Fani Willis and special prosecutor Nathan Wade.
The witness, under scrutiny for why he previously said the pair “absolutely” began dating before Willis hired Wade, was often evasive under oath. He frequently had to have his memory refreshed about past statements. And, at least once, he changed his answer to a question after being shown an exhibit that disproved his earlier testimony.
Asked point blank about whether he lied when he previously made claims about the timeline of the relationship, roughly 10 seconds passed before Bradley tentatively answered: “Did I lie?”
“That’s a simple question, Mr. Bradley, you’re a lawyer,” defense attorney Richard Rice, who represents Robert Cheeley, retorted.
Anonymous
>>1272120 Isn't this the case about to be thrown out because the Special Prosecutor and the DA got exposed as having a secret love affair, and that the DA used said relationship to profit financially from the case?
https://apnews.com/article/fani-willis-nathan-wade-trump-election-indictment-169bc26a4e8f46bbd22f5617e1bcfc93 Lmao
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1272121 Not if the subject of the thread you posted this in is the best Trump's team can do, no
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1272121 bro are you on internet explorer or something? keep up
Anonymous
Quoted By:
He didn't confirm anything about the relationship beginning but it was clear he was covering for his frat pals in the DA office. I wish he would've been objective about it i don't know why he feels he needs to cover for them.
Anonymous
>>1272121 Smear job by Republicans that was exposed.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1272121 >Isn't this the case about to be thrown out because the Special Prosecutor and the DA got exposed as having a secret love affair They were openly dating (Special Prosecutor and his wife are separated). And the affair was over by the time anyone gave a fuck about it.
>the DA used said relationship to profit financially from the case? Proofs?
>>1272120 In point of fact, he said he absolutely "thought" they began dating before Willis hired Wade when asked. That was a claim of opinion, not of fact. Cutting context down to a single word to spin it into something it's not is fucking ridiculous.
Anonymous
>>1272153 Hunter Biden caused this
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1272121 chud headcanon is so wild
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1272120 They never had a case. They were just trying to delay
aint nothin' craftier than the FOX
>>1272120 Biden is still letting in those Hannibal disease infected zombies to steal muh job.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1272173 He's a pretty busy guy
Anonymous
>The divorce attorney Fani Willis's lover testifying that he doesn't remember anything under oath
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1272213 But enough about Republican human trafficking.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1272275 Except he was weaponized by Republicans to distract from Trump's coup.
Anonymous
>>1272275 >It's bad for them because the witness for the other side can't prove a negative ...no?
That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works.
Also, whether or not they were fucking beforehand isn't even the primary issue here. The immediate question is "is something about the situation prejudicial to Trump". There's a second ethical question about her either profiting from the case or choosing the lawyer because of a pre-existing relationship, but even if there were evidence of ethical violations (which there are not) that might get Fani Willis off the case, but it wouldn't help Trump.
Anonymous
>>1272279 A witness who was in the middle of the whole "affair" who gets called to testify and suddenly "doesn't remember anything" can lead to plenty of conclusions being made by the jury, or in this case the judge, numbnuts.
I'm actually not sure what the specific burden of proof would be in this case, (shouldn't it be the appearance of impropriety? I imagine it's not, though, because we're way, way past that)
Anonymous
>>1272280 >A witness who was in the middle of the whole "affair" who gets called to testify and suddenly "doesn't remember anything" can lead to plenty of conclusions being made by the jury, or in this case the judge, numbnuts. 1. Adverse inference can only be used in civil matters. So no, what you're talking about can't happen. You actually have to fucking prove your case in criminal matters. You want someone to be considered lying, you have to produce evidence to the contrary. A thing Trump's lawyers have utterly failed to do. You could have the shittiest witnesses in the world, but as long as there's nobody to challenge their story and no evidence to the contrary, a judge isn't going to say they were lying.
2. Burden of proof is on the Trump team in the motion against the state.
3. The guy wasn't "in the middle of the whole 'affair'". He talked about the affair with the guy once and didn't remember when that conversation was. He had no and did not ever claim to ever have had any first hand knowledge of them hooking up before the dude was hired. Likewise he had jack shit as far as physical evidence or communications to back up the claims against the prosecution.
4. Even if he had actually fucking delivered, this shit still isn't fucking prejudicial to fucking Trump. He's not gonna get a less fair trial because the DA and special prosecutor are literally in bed together when they were already figuratively in bed together. Beyond that, they broke up fucking months ago.
tl;dr Trump's team literally doesn't have any evidence or testimony to prove their case. They have an allegation and that's it.
Anonymous
>>1272291 >Adverse inference Lol, this applies to people who testify and plead the 5th; not retards who take the stand and say they can't remember anything.
You are retarded and you should feel retarded. I'm not going to go on and debunk your bullshit point by point because you literally think that as long as some layman dipshit like you can choose to believe something there's a way to make the law justify it through selective reading.
Anonymous
>>1272292 I know what it applies to. My point is you were thinking of the wrong bullshit. I wasn't saying adverse inference applies to this shit, YOU WERE.
>you literally think that as long as some layman dipshit like you can choose to believe something there's a way to make the law justify it through selective reading. You literally think that the law must be on your side, but that everyone is out to get you, so you'll lose anyway. Don't lecture me about choosing to believe shit.
About the only thing you're right about is that your side will fucking lose.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1272291 >Trump's team literally doesn't have any evidence or testimony to prove their case. They have an allegation and that's it. MANY such cases.
Anonymous
>>1272314 >I know what it applies to. My point is you were thinking of the wrong bullshit. I wasn't saying adverse inference applies to this shit, YOU WERE. Lol no you fucking retard, you and the rest of the libshit brigade are here to declare victory because the guy got on the witness stand and had to (obviously lie) and say he didn't remember a bunch of shit they presented him evidence of, including 11 months of his text messages.
Your assertion that his sudden amnesia means his testimony is useless or somehow legally protected is both laughable and retarded.
The whore Fani was fucking this dude Nathan and paying him thousands of dollars in taxpayer money to go on vacations together.
I assume none of you faggots watched Fani testify about the cash money she was paying Nathan Wade, because if you had you would know how bad all this looks.
Anonymous
>>1272322 >you and the rest of the libshit brigade As opposed to you and the rest of the Trump damage control team?
Anonymous
>>1272324 I watched the testimony, which is more than you ignorant faggots can say.
Anonymous
>>1272322 >and say he didn't remember a bunch of shit they presented him evidence of, including 11 months of his text messages During which he mentions them dating before he was hired once...and it's speculation.
Also, I remind you HE WAS YOUR FUCKING WITNESS. Saying you can't trust a word he says isn't fucking good news for you. Now then, do you have anyone reliable willing to testify that something wrong happened or any physical evidence it did? No? Fuck off and die.
>I assume none of you faggots watched Fani testify about the cash money she was paying Nathan Wade, because if you had you would know how bad all this looks. The cash money witnesses remembered her paying which proves she wasn't profiting from the arrangement? Motherfucker do you even understand your own god damn position?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1272333 >I watched the testimony, which is more than you ignorant faggots can say. Then you can surely point to literally anything that proves your case instead of screaming that everyone involved looks sus. You can do that, right? Right?
Anonymous
>>1272335 >Also, I remind you HE WAS YOUR FUCKING WITNESS. You are convincingly retarded, and this isn't how the law works. He was Nathan Wade's divorce attorney and he had text messages talking about him fucking Fani Willis before they 'admit' to doing it, and he doesn't remember whether or not he lied to the prosecutor when he's under oath? Weird.
That's without even bringing up the money and vacations they took. The money Fani gave to Wade was supposedly specifically designated to funding outside attorneys to address the covid backlog; and yet here she is misappropriating it on her personal campaign promise to get Trump by spending it on vacations for her and her new boyfriend.
Lol, bruh.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>tfw you will never have a thicc, strong, independent black woman bang your gavel between 11pm and 3am
Anonymous
>>1272338 >He was Nathan Wade's divorce attorney and he had text messages talking about him fucking Fani Willis before they 'admit' to doing it Yes. Text messages "with the Trump defense team" in which he was asked
>Do you think it started before she hired him? And he responded
>Absolutely. That's the fucking text you're referring to, you dishonest shitstain. It was him speculating on when he thought shit started in gossip. It wasn't him texting with either the DA or the special prosecutor about them fucking. Fuck, it wasn't even a text WHILE THEY WERE TOGETHER.
>He was Nathan Wade's divorce attorney Oh shit, a witness knew people he was testifying about. Shocker!
>this isn't how the law works Actually it is how the law works. Trump's lawyers called him to rebut Willis and her ex, something he failed to do, I remind you.
>That's without even bringing up the money and vacations they took. The money Fani gave to Wade was supposedly specifically designated to funding outside attorneys to address the covid backlog; and yet here she is misappropriating it on her personal campaign promise to get Trump by spending it on vacations for her and her new boyfriend. Do you have any evidence any money is unaccounted for? I didn't think so.
Lol, bruh.
Anonymous
>>1272344 Imagine being retarded enough to think all you have to do to get away with any crime you want is get up on the stand and say "I don't remember."
Guess they just can't prove anything, eh faggots?
Anonymous
>>1272349 That and "my staffers did it" is unironically an effective tactic.
Anonymous
>>1272352 Until the staffer has to get on the stand and tell the truth or face prison, too.
Anonymous
>>1272353 Wanna bet? Never happened to Clinton's IT staff or her lawyers. Some were subpoenaed by congress and plead the 5th.
Anonymous
>>1272360 Weird how the law gets applied differently for a Democrat than a Republican, huh?
Anonymous
>>1272362 Poor persecuted white kid
Anonymous
>>1272362 Might have something to do with the fact that Republicans break the law and Democrats don't.
Shocking to you, I know.
Anonymous
>>1272405 And there's the reason Democrat staffers never go to prison for refusing to testify, meanwhile Peter Navarro is in prison now.
I don't expect you brain dead faggots to even know who that is, though.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1272408 Peter Navarro is a fucking retard. He should have went to congress and plead the 5th to every question. He's in prison because he decided to ignore the subpoena.
Anonymous
>>1272349 >Imagine being retarded enough to think all you have to do to get away with any crime you want is get up on the stand and say "I don't remember." This literally doesn't relate to anything criminal on the part of the prosecution.
To borrow a phrase, Trump is the one on trial here.
I don't know how brain broken you have to be to think these folks are fighting for their life or something, but I'd imagine it's somewhere between sunny side up and scrambled.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1272425 Preemptive:
Damn, conservative fantasies are fucking wild!
If I'm not around, somebody go ahead and link it to anyone dumb enough to ague.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1272408 >Ignore subpoena and pretend you're against the law after you took part in a coup attempt >Get punished for it because America is still a rule of law (Except for Trump because Republicans will destroy the entire country to defend him.) WOOOOW
Anonymous
>>1272121 Even if Ms. Willis is removed from the case, the case should proceed with a new prosecutor, since the alleged wrongdoing on her part is immaterial to the case itself. Unfortunately, finding a replacement presecutor will likely delay the trial.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1272539 One might say it shows a pattern of corruption and all of her cases should be reviewed.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1272852 You got me. I'm shameless.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1272853 Hiring one boyfriend, if she did that, is definitionally not a pattern. There is no pattern of one.
Also , THIS case is already under review and Trump team has jack shit to implicate her as acting corruptly against him. Digging into her past still wouldn't fucking help Trump kill the case. She could turn out to be a serial killer and it wouldn't help Trump as long as the evidence against him holds up and the indictment was valid. You know, the shit Trump would be attacking if this were about anything but delaying the case?
Anonymous
>>1272853 >One might say it shows a pattern of corruption In court, where they can't lie, the best they can come up with is 'boyfriends employment pays him enough to take her on vacations'
Do government lawyers even get paid per case?
Anonymous
>>1272539 From the reading I've done, if Fani gets disqualified under the proceedings, her entire office is also disqualified meaning a different office would have to take up the case, which is unlikely.
Anonymous
>>1272893 Misappropriating taxpayer funds to go on vacations with your new girlfriend is illegal, bud.
Anonymous
>>1272939 >meaning a different office would have to take up the case, which is unlikely. It isn't unlikely
>>1272941 You sound incredibly jealous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1272120 >Why isn’t he playing the entrapment game????? Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1272946 >It isn't unlikely It is. It’s a high profile politicized case with baggage that will potentially hurt the prosecution office that takes it.
Anonymous
>>1272941 >Misappropriating taxpayer funds Odd way of describing his salary.
What else can government workers not do with their wages that non-government employees can?
Anonymous
>>1272972 And at what point can we stop engaging with trumpfags who have left reality
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1272972 Using his firm's credit card to pay for a vacation to Napa with Fani... wonder how he'll justify that one.
Oh wait, no I don't, lol. They're busted. The only chance they have is that the judge presiding over the case literally donated to Fani Willis's campaign, but even he may be forced to dismiss the case based on what's come forward. We'll find out soon either way.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1272973 They're still Americans for now
Anonymous
